By
now, it’s clear that Indiana’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act was
crafted to empower piously bigoted entrepreneurs and companies desirous
of freelancing with their own “Jim Crow for gays” restrictions, and to
let them cite as legal justification for doing so their precious
religious sensibilities.
The RFRA, said the original text, sought to
give judicial succor to those who found that their “exercise of religion
. . . has been substantially burdened,” or was just “likely to be
substantially burdened” by performing services for people their faith’s
sacred credos enjoin them to abhor (gays, in this case). The ensuing
uproar in the media and business circles compelled Indiana’s state
Senate to amend the legislation to prevent its deployment against the LBGT community, but state Democrats are still calling for its repeal.
The danger, however, has by no means passed. RFRAs already exist
in 21 other states (in three of which, bills are pending to fortify
them), and three more are considering adopting similar measures. The
RFRA just passed last week in Arkansas may allow faith-based discrimination; we now await a test case.
If a case involving a new manifestation of such legislation (say, the Arkansan RFRA) ever lands before the nine-member Roberts Court, its five conservative justices will no doubt adjudicate in favor of the faithful – and against rationalists who hold that religion, in no shape or form, should be allowed to infect our legal system. What is really needed is a federal LGBT shield law, but none exists.
Read more: - by Our coming theocratic hell: Look out, the right’s “religious freedom” push is just the beginning - Salon.com
No comments:
Post a Comment