A
contest for political control of Europe is gearing up between two
American teams, one headed by the long-established George Soros, and
the other now being set up by the upstart Steve Bannon, US President
Donald Trump’s former campaign-manager. Soros has long led America’s
liberal billionaires in controlling Europe, and Bannon is now organizing
a team of America’s conservative billionaires to wrest
that control from the liberal ones.
Whereas Soros claims to represent the public’s interests, Bannon claims to represent the population’s interests — that’s the ‘populist’ side of America’s billionaires, versus the established ‘public-interest’ (Soros) side of them.
For the complete report click on: America’s Billionaires Battle Each Other for Political Control over Europe
Whereas Soros claims to represent the public’s interests, Bannon claims to represent the population’s interests — that’s the ‘populist’ side of America’s billionaires, versus the established ‘public-interest’ (Soros) side of them.
Two American brands of ‘philanthropists'
will thus now be fighting for control over Europe's political markets
(or institutions).
It’s a battle to serve either ’the public’ or else ’the people’, and each political brand
will be struggling to keep Europe as an ally in American billionaires’
war against Russia (which all American billionaires want to defeat), but each team does this from a different ideological perspective, one being ‘liberal’, and the other being ‘conservative’.
Just as there is liberal-conservative political polarization between billionaires domestically
within a nation, there also is such political polarization
between billionaires regarding their given nation’s foreign policies;
and America’s billionaires are politically very highly polarized, both
nationally and, increasingly, internationally as well. None of them is
progressive, or left-populist. The only ‘populism’ that any billionaire
currently promotes is right-‘populist', which is Bannon’s team. (Stalin
was left-‘populist’; and Hitler was right-‘populist’; but neither
dictator really was at all populist, which is simply democratic and
against the aristocracy.) Both teams demonize each other within the
United States for control over the US Government, but both are now
competing against each other internationally for control over the entire
world, by two different brands: liberal versus conservative. Both
brands endorse ‘democracy’ or “the allies”; and both support spreading that ‘democracy’ by means of invading and occupying ‘dictatorships’ or “the enemies.”
In Europe, this is called “imperialism”; in America, it is called “neo-conservatism” or “neoconservatism”;
but no American billionaire actively opposes it (because to oppose it
would be to oppose the aristocracy itself,
the billionaires’ control over the Government — the very system that has been enormously successful for them, far more than the public itself recognizes)
For the complete report click on: America’s Billionaires Battle Each Other for Political Control over Europe
No comments:
Post a Comment