The beauty of gross domestic product is its single figure. It
squishes all of human activity into a couple of digits, like a frog
jammed into a matchbox. As this image of an unfortunate amphibian
suggests, this condensing is also GDP’s flaw. How can the sum total of
everything we do as human beings be so compacted? How can our activity
be conflated with something as complex, nuanced and contested as our
wellbeing?
GDP's inventor Simon Kuznets was adamant that his measure had
nothing to do with wellbeing. But too often we confuse the two. For
seven decades, gross domestic product has been the global elite’s go-to
number. Fast growth, as measured by GDP, has been considered a mark of
success in its own right, rather than as a means to an end, no matter
how the fruits of that growth are invested or shared. If something has
to be sacrificed to get GDP growth moving, whether it be clean air,
public services, or equality of opportunity, then so be it.
GDP is how we rank countries and judge their performance. It is the
denominator of choice. It determines how much a country can borrow and
at what rate. But GDP is well past its sell-by date, as people are
starting to realise. However brilliant the concept, a measure that was
invented in the manufacturing age as a means of fighting the Depression
is becoming less and less capable of imparting sensible signals about
complex modern economies.
Pointing out the defects of GDP and even tentatively suggesting
alternatives is no longer controversial. Former French President Nicolas
Sarkozy commissioned a panel led by Joseph Stiglitz, a Nobel economist,
to examine the issue. It was creating a dangerous “gulf of
incomprehension”, Sarkozy said, between experts sure of their knowledge
and citizens “whose experience of life is completely out of sync with
the story told by the data”.
Read more at: 5 ways GDP gets it totally wrong as a measure of our success | World Economic Forum
GDP is a gross number. It is the sum total of everything we produce
over a given period. It includes cars built, Beethoven symphonies
played and broadband connections made. But it also counts plastic waste
bobbing in the ocean, burglar alarms and petrol consumed while stuck in
traffic.
Kuznets was uneasy about a measure that treated all production
equally. He wanted to subtract, rather than add, things he considered
detrimental to human wellbeing, such as arms, financial speculation and
advertising. You may disagree with his priorities. The point is that GDP
makes no distinction. From the perspective of global GDP, Kim Jong-un’s
nuclear warheads do just as well as hospital beds or apple pie.
No comments:
Post a Comment