Advertise On EU-Digest

Annual Advertising Rates
Showing posts with label Controversial. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Controversial. Show all posts

11/29/19

China-Ghana Relations: Ghana goes ahead with US$2 billion Chinese bauxite barter deal that has conservationists up in arms

Ghana is going ahead with a controversial US$2 billion deal where China will build roads and bridges in exchange for bauxite ore mined in part of West Africa’s Upper Guinean Rainforest.

Beijing has released a first tranche of funds worth US$649 million under the Sinohydro deal, Ghanaian Vice-President Mahamudu Bawumia said on Monday.

The agreement also included a 300 million yuan (US$42.7 million) grant and debt forgiveness worth US$35.7 million to help with Ghana’s infrastructure development, he said.

Read more at: Ghana goes ahead with US$2 billion Chinese bauxite barter deal that has conservationists up in arms | South China Morning Post

2/21/18

France presents new immigration bill

French President Emmanuel Macron's government presented a controversial immigration bill to the Cabinet on Wednesday, amid criticism from migrant organizations and members of Macron's own party.

Macron has faced pressure to act on immigration after he won the 2017 presidential election, which saw 34 percent of the second round vote go to far-right National Front leader Marine Le Pen, who had campaigned on immigration concerns.

The new legislation includes plans to: 
  • Introduce fines of €3,750 ($4,620) or a 1-year jail term for people who illegally cross borders within the EU
  • Double the time asylum-seekers can be held in detention to 90 days
  • Halve the amount of the time asylum-seekers have to appeal if their refugee status is denied
  • Hasten the deportation of those asylum-seekers deemed to be economic migrants
  • Cut the average waiting time on asylum applications from 11 months to six 
Interior Minister Gerard Collomb has said the law is "balanced" and "aligned with European procedures," arguing that if France did not tighten its laws it would attract refugees put off by tougher rules elsewhere in Europe.

Read more: France presents new immigration bill | News | DW | 21.02.2018

2/16/18

Netherlands Parliament Recognizes Armenian Genocide - but Government so far takes no action

The lower house of the Dutch parliament, local known as the Tweede Kamer, passed two resolutions on Thursday with a majority vote one recognizing the Armenian Genocide, the other calling on its foreign minister to visit Armenia in April to observe the anniversary of that crime.

According to NLTimes, both motions were submitted by ChristenUnie party parliament member Joel Voordewind. All four coalition parties supported the motions.

The Netherlands has not recognized the Genocide thus far, however, the majority of the parliament voted on Thursday to change that course and officially recognize the events of 1915 as Genocide.

Note: This is a very controversial issue which happened more than 100 years ago and the Netherlands Government would act wisely to refrain from taking any further action on the issue until more research is avaible.

EU-Digest

6/7/16

Brexit: History Says Brexit Will Be Beaten

The “Brexit” camp should enjoy its current slight bounce in the polls, for it may not last. If history is any guide, then “Remain” is still heading for victory on June 23. Past referendums in Britain have tended to produce a late move to the status quo. The record from six such contests in the past four decades is striking:

1975 U.K.-wide referendum on the Common Market
 Gallup’s polls during the final five weeks of the campaign showed that support for leaving the Common Market peaked point with two weeks to go — though the lead for “staying in Europe” was still a massive 28 percent. Gallup’s final eve-of-referendum poll put the lead for the status quo at 36 percent (68-32 percent). The result: a 34.4 percent gap (67.2 percent in, 32.8 percent out).

1979 Scottish referendum on devolution
Just over two weeks before the vote, Mori reported a 28 percent lead for the pro-devolution camp (64-36 percent). With one week to go, the margin was 20 percent (60-40 percent). The swing to the status quo accelerated in the final week. Mori’s eve-of-referendum predicted a 50-50 percent outcome. The result: a narrow 51.6-48.4 percent lead for devolution—a margin too small to reach the winning line set by Parliament, which insisted that 40 percent of Scotland’s entire electorate should support devolution; on the day only 33 percent did so.

1979 Welsh referendum on devolution
With three weeks to go, an Abacus/BBC survey said that 58 percent would vote for the status quo and against devolution. By referendum week, that figure had jumped to 75 percent. On the day, 79.7 percent of voters opted to reject a Welsh assembly.

1997 Welsh referendum on devolution
Three weeks before the vote, Beaufort Research showed a majority of almost two-to-one for devolution. The appetite for change receded significantly towards the end of the campaign; but an eve-of-referendum poll by NOP still indicated a 12 percent lead for devolution (56-44 percent). In the event, Wales did vote to set up its new Assembly, but by the narrowest of margins: 50.3-49.7 percent. Support for the status quo had jumped by 16 points in the final three weeks.

2011 U.K. referendum on the voting system
Three weeks before the vote, telephone polls showed an average 12 percent lead for the status quo (46-44 percent), while online polls showed the two sides neck-and-neck (49 percent for the Alternative Vote, 51 percent for first-past-the-post). With ten days to go, support for the status quo had climbed to 60 percent in telephone polls and 57 percent in online polls. The final online polls showed a 22 percent lead for first-past-the-post (61-39 percent), while the final telephone polls put the margin at 34 percent (67-33 percent). The result: 67.9 percent for the status quo, and 32.1 percent for change—a victory margin of 35.8 percent.

2014 Scottish referendum on independence
The u-turn pattern here was even more dramatic than in the 1975 referendum on the Common Market. For much of the spring and summer, ahead of the September 18 referendum, support for independence hovered around 40 percent. Then, during August and early September, the appetite for independence grew, and with around two weeks to go, three polls by different companies showed the race neck-and-neck.

Read more: History Says Brexit Will Be Beaten

2/1/16

Swiss government proposes paying everyone €2,234.90 a month - by Gianluca Mezzofiore

GET MONEY FOR DOING NOTHING
Swiss residents are to vote on a countrywide referendum about a radical plan to pay every single adult a guaranteed income of €2,234.90  a month. 

The plan, proposed by a group of intellectuals, could make the country the first in the world to pay all of its citizens a monthly basic income regardless if they work or not. 

But the initiative has not gained much traction among politicians from left and right despite the fact that a referendum on it was approved by the federal government for the ballot box on June 5.

Under the proposed initiative, each child would also receive € 130.82 a week.

The federal government estimates the cost of the proposal at € 97.43 billion a year. 

Around € 138.05 bn would have to be levied from taxes, while € 49.62 bn would be transferred from social insurance and social assistance spending.

The group proposing the initiative, which includes artists, writers and intellectuals, cited a survey which shows that the majority of Swiss residents would continue working if the guaranteed income proposal was approved. 

 'The argument of opponents that a guaranteed income would reduce the incentive of people to work is therefore largely contradicted,' it said in a statement quoted by The Local.  

However, a third of the 1,076 people interviewed for the survey by the Demoscope Institute believed that 'others would stop working'.

And more than half of those surveyed (56 percent) believe the guaranteed income proposal will never see the light of day.  

10/11/14

EU-US Trade Negotiations: Concerns rise over US-EU trade talks - as Europe demonstrates against talks - by Andrew Walker

An eneven match
There are rising concerns in Europe over negotiations to liberalise trade with the United States. 

The project, the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, or TTIP, aims to remove a wide range of barriers to bilateral commerce.

Opponents are planning demonstrations and protests across Europe today October 11, with large numbers of events in Germany, France, Spain and Italy,

In Britain, events are planned in at least 15 cities and towns.

One campaigner involved in planning the day of action said she expected at least 400 local actions in about 24 European countries.

The EU and the US launched the negotiations last year and the aim is to stimulate more trade and investment, and, in the process, to produce more economic growth and employment.

One aim of the negotiations is to reduce the costs to business of complying with regulations. A firm in, say Europe, that wants to export to the US often has to comply with two sets of rules.

Critics say the result of this would be lower standards of protection for workers, consumers and the environment. Food safety is a particular concern among European opponents of the negotiations.

In the EU, campaigners say that consumers could be faced with more genetically modified food, hormone treated beef and chicken meat that has been rinsed with chlorine.

Another major concern is the provisions under discussion to enable foreign investors - for example American firms investing in the EU - to sue a host government in some circumstances if they are hit by a change in policy.

That turned out to be so controversial that the European Commission decided to hold a public consultation. There were 150,000 responses which the Commission is still analyzing.

The conduct of the negotiations is also contentious. Campaigners say they are secretive and undemocratic. They also dispute TTIP advocates' claims about the economic benefits.

Overall these negotiations have proven to be extremely controversia and should not be allowed to be shoved down the throats of European Citizens.

Read more: BBC News - Concerns rise over US-EU trade talks