 |
| This clearly was not what the US founding fathers had inmind |
In the months following the Sandy Hook massacre, the FBI received word of a New York-born man named Omar Mateen, who,
according to The New York Times,
had been bragging to co-workers about his affiliations with terrorist
groups. During the following year,
Mateen was again the subject of an
investigation — this time in pursuit of allegations that he was linked
to “an American who went to Syria to fight for an extremist group.” An
FBI official
characterized
Mateen’s contact with the Syria-based suicide bomber as “minimal.”
Consequently, Mateen was removed from the FBI’s Terrorist Screening
Database.
One of many tragic roadblocks that led to the massacre in
Orlando.
Consequently, Mateen easily
purchased an AR-15 style rifle just a few days before using it to
unleash a nightmare of cinematic proportions. Throughout the weekend,
with bodies strewn on the floor of the Pulse nightclub, nearly every
political debate on social media and elsewhere orbited around
who or
what
was to blame for Mateen’s act of terror, beginning with Mateen himself
and descending through a crowd-sourced list of usual suspects.
We’re
all familiar with the roster of shibboleths emerging from all sides of
the debate, but if you happened to have opposed a 2015 law,
known as Senate Amendment 2910,
banning suspects on the federal terrorism watch list from buying
firearms, deflecting blame to Mateen’s alleged ISIS connection is
probably not your best option.
Making this all about terrorism, as
Donald Trump has, only serves to emphasize the GOP’s inability to pass
2910. Sure, the conservative entertainment bubble will allow it. Trump
will clearly dedicate his pathetic, clown-haired blurts to blaming
terrorism while playing the Obama-is-a-secret-Muslim card. Rationality
and logic, on the other hand, won’t allow such contradictory gibberish.
The GOP refused to act on 2910 because, in the face of the National
Rifle Association’s Mafia-like extortion tactics and raw spending power,
the Republicans chickened out and, save for one senator, voted in
lockstep, 54-to-45, to strike down 2910.
The party that
practically branded the concept of patriotism, along with its branding
of 9/11 and the war on terror, collectively decided that banning
suspected terrorists from purchasing AR-15s and the like is a bridge too
far. It’s okay, of course, for your civil liberties to be annihilated
in pursuit of smoking out the evildoers.
Fifteen years ago, a would-be
terrorist tried to blow up an airplane by igniting explosives in his
shoes, and totally botched the whole thing, yet, as a result, we all
have to practically strip naked before boarding an airplane. Meanwhile,
in the wake of San Bernardino, where an AR-style rifle was used, the GOP chose to do… nothing.
Even
with a menu of numbers and facts to the contrary, we’re told we should
focus exclusively on ISIS and whether Obama spoke the words “radical
Islamic terrorism.” If this was exclusively about terrorism, how the
hell can Trump and the others reconcile the party’s opposition to 2910,
not to mention other sensible gun restrictions?
The answer is simple:
they continue to operate with impunity by shoving the story through the
meat grinder of Fox News and AM talk radio, producing enough reasonable
doubt in the form of distracting zingers to obfuscate the path to
accountability.
And so we can expect that nothing will happen.
Again. Nothing will happen, including accountability where
accountability is clearly due.
Read more: The do-nothing-about-guns party: The GOP’s loyalty to the NRA rises above keeping weapons from suspected terrorists - Salon.com