Advertise On EU-Digest

Annual Advertising Rates

8/16/19

Israel-US Relations: Trump draws Israel into row on congresswomen - by Warren Murray

There has been widespread condemnation after Donald Trump recruited Israel into his dispute with outspoken congresswomen by encouraging it to deny entry to Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib, the first two Muslim congresswomen elected to Congress.

“Trump’s Muslim ban is what Israel is implementing, this time against two duly elected members of Congress,” said Omar. A raft of US politicians as well as peak Jewish lobbying groups condemned Israel’s decision and Trump’s part in it.

Netanyahu defended his government’s rationale, claiming the sole purpose of Tlaib’s and Omar’s visit had been “to damage Israel and to foment against Israel”.

Netanyahu said his government would consider allowing Tlaib, who is of Palestinian descent, to visit the occupied West Bank if she requested it on humanitarian grounds. 

Note EU-Digest: This is unbelievable and ridiculous, these two ladies are not only American Citizens, they are also members of Congress.

Read more at: Friday briefing: Trump draws Israel into row on congresswomen | World news | The Guardian

For additional information, including advertising rates - e-mail:Freeplanet@protonmail.com

Denmark: Greenland tells Trump: ′We′re not for sale′

Greenland's government on Friday dismissed the idea of being purchased by the United States.

The statement follows reports that US President Donald Trump was interested in buying the territory from Denmark.

What the government said:
A "short comment" on the government website said that:
  • "We have a good cooperation with the USA, and we see it as an expression of greater interest in investing in our country..."
  • "...Of course, Greenland is not for sale,"
  • "Because of the unofficial nature of the news, the Government of Greenland has no further comments."
Read more at: Greenland tells Trump: ′We′re not for sale′ | News | DW | 16.08.2019

For additional information, including advertising rates - e-mail:Freeplanet@protonmail.com

Britain: Thousands protest in Britain for Kashmir outside Indian High Commission

Thousands of people, many waving Pakistani and Kashmiri flags, protested outside the Indian High Commission in London on Thursday in support of the disputed Himalayan region of Kashmir.

India's decision to revoke special status for its portion of Kashmir, along with a communications blackout and curbs on movement, caused fury in Pakistan, which cut trade and transport links and expelled India's envoy in retaliation.

In London, protesters carried banners saying "Kashmir is Burning", "Free Kashmir" and "Modi: Make Tea Not War", according to a Reuters reporter.

 Read more: UPDATE 1-Thousands protest in Britain for Kashmir outside Indian High Commission

The Digest  Group
For additional information, including advertising rates - e-mail:Freeplanet@protonmail.com

8/15/19

Combatting Terrorism: EU may extend 'passenger name records' to rail and sea - by Peter Teffer

The national governments of the EU member states are considering extending mandatory record-keeping of air passenger data to high-speed rail travel and sea traffic.

A majority of states have said in diplomatic discussions that they were in favour of applying the rules from the EU's passenger name record (PNR) directive, currently only applicable to air travel, to other modes of transportation.

The PNR directive, adopted in 2016 to fight terrorism, requires air carriers to transfer personal data about their customers to the authorities.

In February, Romania (then holding the rotating six-month presidency of the Council of the EU) sent member states a confidential document with the results of a questionnaire about the future of the PNR directive.

The paper, published on the Statewatch website, said that "the majority of the member states agreed on broadening the scope of the PNR directive".

Read more: EU may extend 'passenger name records' to rail and sea

For additional information, including advertising rates - e-mail:Freeplanet@protonmail.com

German US Relations: Why US President Trump is avoiding visiting Germany - again

Trump has yet to pay a bilateral visit to Germany, which is very unusual for a US president. What is holding him back, and what does it say about the US-German relationship?

Next week the American Air Force One plane will embark on its next transatlantic flight - US President Donald Trump’s 15th trip abroad.

First off, he will fly to the G7 summit in Biarritz, France, and just a few days later the President is due to visit Poland and Denmark.

Yet Trump, once again, is avoiding stopping in Germany, traditionally one of the closest allies of the US.

The US president has now been in office for more than two and a half years, and there has been no bilateral visit - or one not linked to a summit meeting - to the Bundesrepublik. Nor is any planned.

That says a lot about the relationship between Berlin and Washington.

Read more at: Why US President Trump is avoiding visiting Germany -again  - The Local

For additional information, including advertising rates - e-mail:Freeplanet@protonmail.com

Brexit: plans in place to mitigate impact of no deal

If the UK leaves the EU without a deal, the effects will be felt by people and companies across Europe. The EU has adopted measures to mitigate the impact of a disorderly withdrawal.

The EU has repeatedly stressed that it favours an orderly withdrawal of the UK from the Union. It concluded a withdrawal agreement with the UK to ensure the two parties can continue to collaborate on various issues to their mutual benefit, nevertheless the EU has adopted measures to reduce the impact of a possible no-deal Brexit.

These measures cannot replicate the advantages of being part of the EU. They are temporary, unilateral measures. Some will require UK’s reciprocity in order for them to come in force.

Long-term solutions depend on future discussions between the EU and the UK.

See below for the measures preparing the EU for a no-deal Brexit:

Visas

Brits will be able to enter the EU without a visa for short periods provided the same applies to people from the EU traveling to the UK.

Aviation

UK airlines would be able to provide services to EU countries provided EU companies are also able to do so to the UK.

Rail services

The validity of rail safety authorisations would be extended to ensure the continuity of rail services between the UK and the EU, provided the UK does the same.

Road transport

Freight transport and bus and coach operators from the UK would be able to provide services between Britain and the EU, provided the UK provides equivalent access to EU companies.

Social security

EU citizens in the UK and UK citizens in the EU would keep social security benefits acquired before the withdrawal.

Erasmus+

Students and teachers in or from the UK would be able to complete their ongoing learning abroad as part of the Erasmus+ programme.

Peace process in Northern Ireland

Funding for bilateral peace programmes in Northern Ireland would continue until at least 2020 to help support the peace and reconciliation process started by the Good Friday agreement.

Fishing

If the UK agrees to full reciprocity of access to fishing waters, an easy procedure is in place for companies to obtain authorisation to fish. Quota swapping would still be allowed until these measures end on 31 December.

If the UK does not agree, EU firms banned from UK waters could be eligible for compensation from the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund.

Defence

EU firms will still be able to export certain items used for civilian and military purposes to the UK.

Driving licences

Driving licences issued by one EU country are automatically recognised by other member states. When the UK leaves, this will no longer apply to British licences. EU nationals wishing to drive in the UK will need to check with UK authorities if their licence is valid, while Brits will need to check with the national authorities of each EU country in which they wish to drive. International driving licences are valid across the UK and EU.

Pets

The EU pet passport, which allows your pet to travel with you to another EU country, will no longer be valid in the UK. It is likely more paperwork will be needed when taking your pet to or from the UK.

Medical treatment

Under EU rules people benefit from access to healthcare during a temporary stay in another member states using the European Health Insurance Card (EHIC). These rules will no longer apply to the UK. Both EU nationals travelling to the UK and Brits visiting EU countries should check whether their insurance covers the costs of medical treatment abroad. If not, they should consider taking out private travel insurance.

For additional information about traveling to and from the UK, check out the website from the EU Commission

All of these measures can only come into effect with European Parliament’s approval.

Any agreement reached by the EU and UK - including the withdrawal agreement and any agreement on future relations - must be agreed by the Parliament before it can enter into force.

Next steps

None of these temporary measures can replace actual agreements. Only once the UK has left the EU, the EU and the UK, as a third country, can look at the future relations and might wish to conclude deals to ensure they can continue to work together on issues ranging from trade to security, migration and defence. The political declaration attached to the withdrawal agreement, if ratified by the UK, gives the general framework on how these relations could look like. 

Find out more 
European Commission implements “no-deal” contingency action plan in specific sectors (19 December 2018)

Read more at: Brexit: plans in place to mitigate impact of no deal | News | European Parliament

For additional information, including advertising rates - e-mail:Freeplanet@protonmail.com

British - US Relations: White House vows to stand with UK under no-deal Brexit scenario

The White House will place the UK “first in line” for a comprehensive new trade deal with the United States in the event of a “no-deal” Brexit, according to US National Security Advisor John Bolton who was in London to meet with British Prime Minister Boris Johnson on Monday.

Bolton outlined the prospect of a sector-by-sector bilateral agreement, starting with manufacturing, and noted that President Donald J. Trump were both “Leavers before there were leavers” in reference to the popular term for British voters that support the UK’s withdrawal from the EU.

The Trump administration has pledged to stand with the UK with or without a new deal being negotiated with Brussels by the 31 October Brexit deadline.
\
“The main purpose of this visit, really, is to convey President Trump’s desire to see a successful exit from the EU for the UK on 31 October,” Bolton told the press.

Note EU-Digest: Once again, the US Trump Administration shows they know very little about diplomacy by mingling and showing sides in British and EU negotiations, just to benefit their own lop-sided objectives, including offering the British a bi-lateral agreement which will tie Britain hands and feet to the USA.
 
Read more: White House vows to stand with UK under no-deal Brexit scenario | New Europe

For additional information, including advertising rates - e-mail:Freeplanet@protonmail.com

8/14/19

Britain - Brexit: PM Boris Johnson says Brexit opponents collaborating with EU

Boris Johnson: Brexit opponents 'collaborating' with EU

Read more at: 

For additional information, including advertising rates - e-mail:Freeplanet@protonmail.com

USA: Dow Jones plunges more than 8oo points

Hong Kong - the party is over as Chinese troops massing near the border

Troops at the border: A Chinese military intervention in Hong Kong? Video and satellite images released this week show Chinese military troops massing near the border with Hong Kong. Is it just an exercise in intimidation or is there a real threat of a Chinese military intervention?

Read more at: 

For additional information, including advertising rates - e-mail:Freeplanet@protonmail.com

8/13/19

USA: who else could be involved in Jeffrey Epsteins sex scandel

Who could be involved in Jeffrey Epstein’s sex scandal? Jeffrey Epstein's death in prison from an apparent suicide as he awaited trial on sex trafficking charges came after newly released testimony linked the disgraced financier to several high-profile personalities.

Read more at:  


For additional information, including advertising rates - e-mail:Freeplanet@protonmail.com

Guatemala-US relations: New President elect says US recent deal on immigrants a "non starter"

Britain - Brexit: could the Britsh Queen fire Boris Johnson

China-US trade war: US delays tariffs on key Chinese goods, prompting market surge

US delays tariffs on key Chinese goods, prompting market surge



For additional information, including advertising rates - e-mail:Freeplanet@protonmail.com

8/12/19

USA - Immigration Rule Changes: Trump Administration Taking Immigration Back to 1882 - by Nicole Goodkind

This morning President Trump’s Department of Homeland Security released a rule change that would drastically alter the legal immigration system in the United States. The change would stop a number of residents working in the U.S. from obtaining green cards and favor wealthy migrants over those looking to escape economic hardship.

The changes, presented to the press by Acting U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Director Ken Cuccinelli, are known as the “public charge” rule, and they advise immigration officials to reject or ding immigration applicants who have used certain public services in the past. The rule also allows immigration officials to judge applicants based on how likely it is they’ll need public assistance in the future.

Speaking to the press, Cuccinelli was unable to specify any of the economic benefits this program change would have.

“The benefit is long-term benefit, self-sufficiency is critical for the U.S. and American taxpayers going forward,” he said. But, he clarified, there is no dollar amount “because the benefit for taxpayers is forward-looking.”

Cuccinelli also shook off questions about whether the timing of this announcement was wise, just days after a shooting that killed 22 in El Paso, Texas, was perpetrated by a white nationalist who had posted anti-immigration rants.

“That divisiveness may be more rhetorical,” he said.

But others disagree. “Just a week after a terrorist attack in which a white supremacist killed 22 people in El Paso and specifically targeted the Latino community, the Trump administration has launched its most radical attempt yet to harm immigrant families and further its anti-immigrant agenda,” said Philip E. Wolgin, managing director of immigration policy at the Center for American Progress, a progressive think tank.

“This latest attempt to harm immigrants comes on the heels of three years of anti-immigrant rhetoric and actions from the president, who has worked to normalize hate in the United States. In El Paso, we saw the painful consequences of this climate of hate.”

Some worry that the new rules will have a chilling effect on migrants, and that they will not seek out necessary healthcare or go hungry in order to have a better shot at a green card.

“It will sow more fear in immigrant communities and almost certainly lead many immigrants who are in the United States legally as well as their family members to forgo health coverage, nutrition assistance and housing assistance that they need and are eligible for under federal law,” wrote Center on Budget and Policy Priorities President Robert Greenstein in a statement.

The new 837-page rule, which was long pushed by Trump aide Stephen Miller and will go into effect on October 15, is based off wording in the Immigration Act of 1882, which says that the U.S. government can deny access to anyone they deem likely to become a “public charge.” Congress and the federal government, however, never defined what it meant to be a public charge before. This rule changes that.

Any immigrant who receives one or more public benefits for 12 months within any 36 month period can now now likely be denied a green card. Those benefits focus on cash and income assistance and include Supplemental Security Income and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, according to a fact sheet.

The Migration Policy Institute has estimated that nearly half of all family green cards would be denied under this program.

Advocates also worry that the policy changes will have a “chilling effect” on U.S. citizens who have family members applying for green cards and will dissuade them from using public benefits as well. In many cases, children born in the U.S. are legal citizens while their parents are not. Cuccinelli said Monday that this wasn’t a problem because the U.S. wanted migrants who were able to “stand on their own two feet.”

“This policy denies a permanent, secure future in this country to anyone who isn’t white and wealthy,” said Marielena Hincapié, executive director of the National Immigration Law Center. “We will not stand for it. The National Immigration Law Center is preparing to sue to fight back against this regulation and protect immigrant families.”

A new study by the Pew Research Center, meanwhile, found that 65 percent of Americans think the federal government is doing a bad job dealing with the increased number of people seeking asylum at the U.S.-Mexico border and 72 percent of Americans said that undocumented immigrants should be allowed to stay in the U.S. legally if certain conditions are met.

Read more at : Trump Administration Taking Immigration Back to 1882

For additional information, including advertising rates - e-mail:Freeplanet@protonmail.com

Brexit?: UK MPs' maths means election, not no-deal Brexit - by Tobias Gras

Having lost the by-election in the previously-safe Conservative Welsh seat of Brecon and Radnorshire, the Remain coalition of Liberal Democrats, Greens and the Welsh nationalist party Plaid Cymru has demonstrated that Conservative seats – even in Leave-leaning constituencies – can be won, as the 'Boris bounce' fails to annihilate the Brexit Party, and the weakness of the Labour party fuels a Liberal surge.

With a majority of just one in the House of Commons, it takes only two Tory defectors to carry a motion of no confidence in Boris Johnson.

This will happen, and the prime minister knows it.

So when actively preparing for a hard Brexit on October 31st, Johnson is right to say it is less likely to happen.

Not – as he claims – since the EU will budge, but because two or more heroes or traitors, depending on one's point of view, will defect and bring down his government to prevent no-deal Brexit from happening.

The interesting question is what happens next?

In any case, a hard Halloween Brexit on October 31st seems increasingly unlikely. 

Read more at: UK MPs' maths means election, not no-deal Brexit

The Digest  Group
Almere-Digest
EU-Digest
Insure-Digest 
Turkish-Digest 

For additional information, including advertising rates - e-mail:Freeplanet@protonmail.com

US 2020 Presidential Elections: Scaramucci: GOP may need to replace Trump for 2020 - by Chris Mills Rodrigo

Former White House communications director Anthony Scaramucci told Axios on Sunday that Republicans may need to find a candidate to replace President Trump in 2020.

"We are now in the early episodes of 'Chernobyl' on HBO, where the reactor is melting down and the apparatchiks are trying to figure out whether to cover it up or start the clean-up process," Scaramucci, who was ousted from his job after 11 days, told the outlet.

Scaramucci, a prominent Republican donor, said that if Trump "doesn't reform his behavior, it will not just be me, but many others will be considering helping to find a replacement in 2020."

"Right now, it's an unspeakable thing," he continued. "But if he keeps it up, it will no longer be unspeakable. The minute they start speaking of it, it will circulate and be socialized. We can't afford a full nuclear contamination site post 2020."

Scaramucci's comments to Axios follow him last week calling Trump's visit to El Paso, Texas, to meet with survivors of a mass shooting a "catastrophe."

Trump fired back soon after, saying that Scaramucci "knows very little about me other than the fact that this Administration has probably done more than any other Administration in its first 2 1/2 years of existence."

Former Massachusetts Gov. William Weld is the only Republican to announce a challenge to Trump for the nomination so far.

Former South Carolina Rep. Mark Sanford (R) is also considering a possible candidacy.

Read more: Scaramucci: GOP may need to replace Trump for 2020 | TheHill

The Digest  Group
Almere-Digest
EU-Digest
Insure-Digest 
Turkish-Digest 

For additional information, including advertising rates - e-mail:Freeplanet@protonmail.com