Perhaps the most difficult aspect of any modern political system and especially that of the US is to be able to
reconcile, at least from an ethical standpoint, the issue of campaign finance with that of moral convictions and democratic principles..
Plato's argument against democracy was that it would promote skilled campaigners rather than qualified leaders. This statement needs only to be amended slightly when we look at today's US political system.
In a sense the American democracy now promotes skilled fundraisers while leadership skills have taken a backseat to the ability of extracting funds from contributors
The real ethical issues of campaign finance lie not in their cost, but rather who is providing the funds. In today's America special interest groups have filled the huge gap between private donations and the realistic costs of running a successful political campaign. These interest groups are quite varied in the issues they promote, but unfortunately many of the most powerful are very recognizable, such as energy, tobacco, firearm, insurance, healthcare and the pharmaceutical industry.
Perhaps, even more disturbing, however, is the way that the funds from these groups are distributed.
Historically, donations from political action committees, or PACs as they are called in America, greatly favor incumbents, at a ratio of nearly four dollars donated to incumbent campaigns to every one dollar donated to the challengers.
This notion would seem to imply a direct relationship between accepting monies from special interests and maintaining political power. In its most basic form one could call this influence peddling, but even operating on the assumption that special interest money does not directly has an influence on US political leaders, it certainly gives the appearance of doing so, and consequently has seriously eroded the US public confidence in their political leaders and democracy.
Overall, even with all the above mentioned negatives, the US political system is certainly not beyond repair, but there are problems that need to be addressed with a major sense of urgency. The time to take action is now.
The number one issue, without any doubt, is for the Congress to come to grips with campaign finance reform, along with stricter regulations on the influence and access granted to special interest groups and their lobbyists to government and elected officials.
If nothing gets done, at least in these two major area's of concern, one could assume, just by looking at the polls - which show a strong public support for the military and police (authority and order) - that the use of marshal law as a tool to restore the basic principals on which the US was founded as a Republic, is not as unthinkable as once thought before.
EU-Digest
Plato's argument against democracy was that it would promote skilled campaigners rather than qualified leaders. This statement needs only to be amended slightly when we look at today's US political system.
In a sense the American democracy now promotes skilled fundraisers while leadership skills have taken a backseat to the ability of extracting funds from contributors
The real ethical issues of campaign finance lie not in their cost, but rather who is providing the funds. In today's America special interest groups have filled the huge gap between private donations and the realistic costs of running a successful political campaign. These interest groups are quite varied in the issues they promote, but unfortunately many of the most powerful are very recognizable, such as energy, tobacco, firearm, insurance, healthcare and the pharmaceutical industry.
Perhaps, even more disturbing, however, is the way that the funds from these groups are distributed.
Historically, donations from political action committees, or PACs as they are called in America, greatly favor incumbents, at a ratio of nearly four dollars donated to incumbent campaigns to every one dollar donated to the challengers.
This notion would seem to imply a direct relationship between accepting monies from special interests and maintaining political power. In its most basic form one could call this influence peddling, but even operating on the assumption that special interest money does not directly has an influence on US political leaders, it certainly gives the appearance of doing so, and consequently has seriously eroded the US public confidence in their political leaders and democracy.
In a Gallup poll conducted recently on how Americans rate their institutions Congress ranks last with 9% on this list of 16 institutions; the military with a 76% approval rating earns top spot.. Other institutions which did poorly and scored below 30% in this poll were: Big business (multi-nationals), banking, medical, the press, organized Labor and the criminal justice system.
Overall, even with all the above mentioned negatives, the US political system is certainly not beyond repair, but there are problems that need to be addressed with a major sense of urgency. The time to take action is now.
The number one issue, without any doubt, is for the Congress to come to grips with campaign finance reform, along with stricter regulations on the influence and access granted to special interest groups and their lobbyists to government and elected officials.
If nothing gets done, at least in these two major area's of concern, one could assume, just by looking at the polls - which show a strong public support for the military and police (authority and order) - that the use of marshal law as a tool to restore the basic principals on which the US was founded as a Republic, is not as unthinkable as once thought before.
EU-Digest 
No comments:
Post a Comment