European
and American officials had hoped they could highlight progress on
negotiations for a wide-ranging trade agreement when President Obama
visits Brussels on March 26. But in talks here this week, frustration
has been more evident than headway.
Read more: More Hope Than Headway So Far in U.S.-Europe Trade Talks - NYTimes.com
To
take one example, when announcing the trade talks last year, leaders
said that the agreement would seek to “eliminate all tariffs” on trade
in goods between the United States and the European Union, as a step
toward creating the world’s biggest bilateral trade zone. But this week,
American negotiators accused Europe of seeking to exclude beef, chicken
and pork products from tariff cuts.
What’s
more, the two sides last year set out an ambitious timetable to get a
deal done “on one tank of gas,” by 2015 at the latest. That is seeming
to prove difficult.
The
discussions are still at an early stage, of course. The talks this week
in Brussels, led by L. Daniel Mullaney, the assistant trade
representative of the United States, and by his counterpart for the
European Union, Karel De Gucht, the trade commissioner, were only the
fourth round. By contrast, talks for a grand trade pact with
Asia-Pacific nations and the United States, announced in 2011, are
already headed for their 22nd round.
But
considering the ambitious objective — the creation of a tariff-free
space in which, say, a drug approved in Europe would automatically be
available for sale in the United States without separate clinical trials
— the slow start suggests that the goal of wrapping up an agreement by
next year is looking increasingly unrealistic.
Ignacio
Garcia Bercero, the European Union’s chief negotiator, held a news
conference on Friday with Mr. Mullaney, where both officials said they
had made progress on the issues under discussion but stressed that it
was still early going. They said that another round of talks would be
held in Washington before the summer.
Read more: More Hope Than Headway So Far in U.S.-Europe Trade Talks - NYTimes.com
No comments:
Post a Comment