Sean Haugh, a Libertarian candidate for US Senate in North Carolina,
didn’t file a lawsuit or storm the television studio when he was
excluded from a recent televised debate.
“I just went to work and delivered some pizzas,” he said, referring to his day job.
Read more: Pizza delivery man, other outsider candidates could swing control of the US Senate - Politics - The Boston Globe
“I just went to work and delivered some pizzas,” he said, referring to his day job.
Underdog candidates such as Haugh, who said he
has raised about $10,000, run in every election. But this year, with
polls showing an unusually high number of close races, Haugh and other
dark horses could swing elections - and determine which party controls
the US Senate - even if they don’t win.
Third-party
candidates have a chance to win in two states -- Kansas and, to a far
lesser extent, South Dakota -- while a Libertarian and a Tea Party
Republican could force a run-off in Georgia and Louisiana.
“People are just dissatisfied. They’re not seeing the
reforms they need. They’re not seeing the principled leadership,” said
Amanda Swafford, a Libertarian in Georgia, who could force a run-off
between Republican David Perdue and Democrat Michelle Nunn if neither
candidate wins more than 50 percent of the vote. “In the past, a
third-party vote was considered a protest vote, but this time we are
really seeing a difference.”
These candidates -- several of whom have small
budgets, day jobs, and few or no staffers to hand them talking points
-- present a stark contrast to their mainstream rivals who depend on
poll-tested commercials, scripted stump speeches, and tens of millions
of dollars from outside groups.
Read more: Pizza delivery man, other outsider candidates could swing control of the US Senate - Politics - The Boston Globe
No comments:
Post a Comment