Alongside
the risk of Brexit, Greece's possible exit from the eurozone following
Sunday's referendum should force a debate on how the single market might
function better in the whole of the EU, not simply within the currency
union
The
upcoming British referendum on EU membership that may well bring
Britain out of the union – combined with the increasingly likelihood of a
Greek default and a partial exit from the euro raises in a suddenly
acute form the question of the relationship of the EU and the eurozone.
The new acute crisis demands some innovative thinking to preserve – and
extend – the central benefits of European integration, while thinking
about additional areas that demand a cooperative rather than a
confrontational solution.
The
Maastricht treaty basically assumes that all EU member countries will
satisfy the membership criteria for the currency union and stipulates
that they are then obliged to join. The opt-outs only relate to the UK
and Denmark. The UK has been in a paradoxical position of championing
the rather abstract case (with which probably a majority of economists
agree) that a currency union requires a greater measure of fiscal
integration than the EU or the eurozone currently possesses. US
policymakers made very similar points. But, on the other hand, the UK
made it clear that it did not want to participate in that greater fiscal
integration; and (with the Czech Republic) voted in January 2012 not to
accept the fiscal compact treaty (on “legal grounds”).
Brexit
may thus in theory make a move to greater fiscal integration easier. At
the time of the Maastricht discussions, many European policymakers,
like the influential commission president Jacques Delors, simply assumed
that the EU budget’s share would rise to about three percent of GDP (by
coincidence, that was about the share in peacetime of the US federal
budget during the 19th century).
Instead, the figure remained
stuck at just over one percent (it has actually declined slightly since
the 1990s). Denmark on its own is unlikely to want to remain an
outlier, especially since the management of the currency since the
global financial crisis of 2008 has been rather precarious. There is a
similarly strong case why Sweden might want to end its anomalous “out”
position – for the same kind of reasons as Norway and Switzerland are
finding it very hard to live with an independent currency and to devise
an appropriate set of monetary and exchange rate policies. But, at the
same time, the contemporary Greek experience should be a warning against
thinking that there might be a new political equilibrium that shifts
towards an obvious acceptance of greater fiscal federalism.
In
justifying the “no” in 2012, David Cameron explicitly played the idea
of the common free market out against the eurozone, with its fiscal
promises: "They must not take measures that in any way undermine the EU
single market. We'll be watching like a hawk." What is needed is a
greater degree of flexibility and responsiveness in Europe. In this
spirit, here are some suggestions for improving the functioning of the
single market in the whole of the EU, and not just in the eurozone
(whose definition is getting more precarious):
Read more: Policy Network - Europe’s unfinished business
No comments:
Post a Comment