The Trump presidency passed its one-year mark last month, presenting a
logical opportunity to take stock of the administration’s Middle East
policy. One year is long enough to begin discerning some of the systemic
implications of the new administration’s policies. It may seem a
quixotic task to evaluate President Donald Trump against his campaign
rhetoric, given his notorious message indiscipline. But for all of his
flip-flopping during the 2016 presidential campaign, he nevertheless
offered, even if he never fully articulated, a series of fairly
consistent positions regarding the Middle East.
As with many of the president’s policy positions, the underlying philosophy can best be described as “anything but Obama.” Trump derided his predecessor’s Middle East policy as a “disaster” and accused President Barack Obama of “appl[ying] pressure to our friends and reward[ing] our enemies.”
In this vein, Trump strongly criticized the previous administration’s support of the Arab Spring, saying that he would pursue “regional stability, not radical change” in the Middle East. He viewed Obama’s nuanced approach to friends and enemies alike as a strategic miscalculation.
Read more: The Trouble Before the Storm – Foreign Policy
As with many of the president’s policy positions, the underlying philosophy can best be described as “anything but Obama.” Trump derided his predecessor’s Middle East policy as a “disaster” and accused President Barack Obama of “appl[ying] pressure to our friends and reward[ing] our enemies.”
In this vein, Trump strongly criticized the previous administration’s support of the Arab Spring, saying that he would pursue “regional stability, not radical change” in the Middle East. He viewed Obama’s nuanced approach to friends and enemies alike as a strategic miscalculation.
Read more: The Trouble Before the Storm – Foreign Policy
No comments:
Post a Comment