
The United States has cut off northern Syrian moderate rebel groups from
non-lethal aid, with an al-Qaeda advance in northern Syria physically
blocking the aid’s dispersal, as the Obama administration continues to
‘disengage’ itself from Syria.
The Turkish Daily Hürriyet’s Washington
representative, Tolga Tanış, reported that the Obama administration
commenced its ‘disengagement’ from Syria on Oct. 2, laying out three
conditions to the moderate rebels, should they wish for the resumption
of aid.
A joint U.S.-Russia plan on the chemical disarmament of
Syria and clashes between the Western-Arab-backed Free Syrian Army (FSA)
and al-Qaeda-linked rebels known as the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
(ISIS) factored into the halting of aid to the rebels. Turkey closed
its Öncüpınar border gate on Sept. 18 amid an al-Qaeda advance and the
U.S. stopped a batch of non-lethal aid to moderate rebels.
If any area of the world lacks a single bright spot for the US, it's
the Middle East. The problems, of course, extend back many years and
many administrations. Kerry is a relative newcomer. Still, he's made
seven
of his 15 overseas trips there, with zero signs of progress on the
American agenda in the region, and much that has only worsened.
The sole pluses came from diplomatic activity initiated by powers not
exactly considered Washington's closest buddies: Russian President
Putin's moves in relation to Syria (on which more later) and new Iranian
President Rouhani's "charm offensive"
in New York, which seems to have altered for the better the
relationship between the two countries. In fact, both Putin's and
Rouhani's moves are classic, well-played diplomacy, and only serve to
highlight the amateurish quality of Kerry's performance.
On the other
hand, the Obama administration's major Middle East commitment—to peace
negotiations between the Israelis and Palestinians—seems destined for a
graveyard already piled high with past versions of the same.
Meanwhile, whatever spark remained of the Arab Spring in Egypt was
snuffed out by a military coup, while the US lamely took forever just to
begin to cut off some symbolic military aid to the new government.
American credibility in the region suffered further damage after State,
in a seeming
panic,
closed embassies across the Middle East in response to a reputed major
terror threat that failed to materialize anywhere but inside
Washington's Beltway.
Prince Bandar bin Sultan of Saudi Arabia was once nicknamed "Bandar Bush" for his
strong support
of the US during the 1991 Desert Storm campaign and the Bush dynasty.
He recently told European diplomats, however, that the Kingdom will
launch a "
major shift"
in relations with the United States to protest Washington's perceived
inaction over the Syria war and its overtures to Iran. The Saudis were
once considered, next to Israel, America's strongest ally in the region.
Kerry's response?
Fly to Paris for some "urgent talks."
Turkey is also no exception when it comes to Kerry.s Middle trip count. He's traveled thereat least
three times, with (again) little to show for his efforts. Turkey led by the egomaniac PM Erdogan, also a NATO member, which in the past refused to help the Bush administration with its
invasion of Iraq, continues to fight a
border war
with Iraqi Kurds. (Both sides do utilize mainly American-made weapons.)
The Turks are active in Syria as well, supporting the rebels, fearing
the Islamic extremists,
lobbing
mortar shells across the border, and suffering under the weight of that
devastated country's refugees.
Meanwhile—a small regional disaster from
a US perspective—Turkish-Israeli relations, once close, continue to
slide. Recently, the Turks even outed a Mossad spy ring to the Iranians,
and no one, Israelis, Turks, or otherwise, seems to be listening to
Washington.
As for Kerry's nine-month performance review, here goes: he often seems
unsure and distracted, projecting a sense that he might prefer to be
anywhere else than wherever he is. In addition, he's displayed a
policy-crippling lack of information, remarkably little poise, and
strikingly bad word choice, while regularly voicing surprising new
positions on old issues. The logical conclusion might be to call for his
instant resignation before more damage is done.
The days of the United States being able to treat the world as its chessboard are over. It's now closer to a
Rubik's Cube
that Washington can't figure out how to manipulate. Across the globe,
people noted how the World's Mightiest Army was fought to a draw (or
worse) in Iraq and Afghanistan by insurgents with only small arms,
roadside bombs, and suicide bombers.
Increasingly, the world is acknowledging America's Kerry-style
clunkiness and just bypassing the US Britain said no to war in Syria.
Russia took over big-box diplomacy. China assumed the pivot role in Asia
in every way except militarily. (They're working on it.) The Brazilian
president simply
snubbed
Obama, canceling a state visit over Snowden's NSA revelations. Tiny
Ecuador continues to raise a middle finger to Washington over the
Assange case. These days, one can almost imagine John Kerry as the
wallflower of some near-future international conference, hoping
someone—anyone—will invite him to dance.
The American Century might be said to have lasted from August 1945
until September 2001, a relatively short span of 56 years. (R.I.P.) John
Kerry's frantic bumbling did not create the present situation; it
merely added mirth to the funeral preparations.
There is however one important positive factor in this depressive story. Maybe out of all these negative developments US foreign policy can eventually be completely overhauled and new policies developed which not only take into consideration the rapidly changing state of the world but which also reflect more accurately the principles on which the country was founded. As Socrates wrote:: "
the greatest way to live with honor in this world is to be what we pretend to be".
EU-Digest