Advertise On EU-Digest

Annual Advertising Rates
Showing posts with label Debate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Debate. Show all posts

9/23/20

USA:Trump falls into the trap he set for Biden - by Gabby Orr and Nancy Cook

 Donald Trump will face Joe Biden within days for the first of three presidential debates, and some of the president’s supporters are already bracing for a humiliating loss. 

White House allies, Republican donors and some of Trump’s closest advisers worry that a recent, frenzied push by his top lieutenants to portray Biden as a seasoned debater — with the goal of raising expectations for the Democratic presidential nominee — is too late and too disingenuous to have an impact when the two meet on the debate stage next Tuesday. 

They worry Trump has set a trap for himself by incessantly attacking Biden’s age and mental acumen. It’s a tactic the president has maintained even as his campaign publicly insists the former vice president is fully capable of a satisfactory performance. Unlike the president, who has spuriously claimed Biden is “probably” on performance-enhancing drugs, Trump campaign communications director Tim Murtaugh attributed Biden’s “quite good” performance in past debates to the Democrat’s ability “to turn it on when the cameras come” after years of experience in politics. 

Read more at: 
Trump falls into the trap he set for Biden - POLITICO

9/2/19

Britain - Brexit: Boris Johnson can expect itense debate im Parliament to block no deal Brexit

Intense parliament debate expected over attempts to block no-deal Brexit. 

Summer recess is over, and Britain's Parliament reconvenes Tuesday to face a momentous decision about whether to intervene to try to prevent a possible "no-deal" exit from the European Union.


Support EU-Digest, which has reported the news without any political affiliation since 2004, and opposes those who seek to discredit news organizations who believe in the right of a free Press, by investing in an advertisement, or by giving a donation to keep our efforts going : to donate or advertise click on: https://www.paypal.com/webapps/hermes?token=8BP18304C1657151J&useraction=commit&mfid=1567106786154_8591ae1288ebf      

5/3/19

EU Commission: Commission candidates clash over EU army proposal

Commission candidates clash over EU army proposal

Read more at: 
https://www.euronews.com/2019/05/03/commission-candidates-clash-over-eu-army-proposal

2/16/15

Islam: France debates ban on Muslim veils in universities

The debate over wearing veils at public universities has resurfaced after reports of professors singling out women for wearing hijabs. Both politicians and the public are struggling to find a balance between French secularism and religious tolerance.

The issue of whether to let women wear scarves at university came into the spotlight earlier this month when a professor at the Paris XIII university said that he did not support “religious symbols in public places”, referring to a young woman wearing a hijab in his class. The professor was demoted for his comments.

In September, a professor at the Sorbonne asked a student if she would continue wearing “that thing” in class, indicating the young woman’s headscarf. The president of the Sorbonne later apologised for the professor’s comments.

Read more: France - France debates ban on Muslim veils in universities - France 24

8/6/14

Scotish Independence: TV debate on Scotland's future turns heated

The leaders in the battle for and against Scottish independence have clashed in a heated live television debate, six weeks ahead of a historic referendum on whether Scotland should leave the United Kingdom.

On Tuesday, First Minister Alex Salmond, leader of the pro-independence Scottish National Party (SNP), went head-to-head for the first time with Alistair Darling, a fellow Scot and leader of the "Better Together" campaign.

"My case this evening is this: no one, no one will do a better job of running Scotland than the people who live and work in this country," Salmond said.

"On September 18 we have the opportunity of a lifetime. We should seize that opportunity with both hands."
But Darling warned of the risks of going it alone and argued that Scotland would pay too high a price to leave the union, saying: "Remember this - if we decide to leave there is no going back, there is no second chance."

Read more: TV debate on Scotland's future turns heated - Europe - Al Jazeera English

5/2/14

European Elections: Candidates spar in live EU TV debate

With flashes of wit, much earnestness and a certain reluctance to go for the jugular of their opponents, four candidates for the European Commission presidency broke new ground on Monday night by holding a live televised debate designed to drum up public interest in the May 22-25 elections for the European parliament.

If social media are one measure of that interest, the debate may have worked. Halfway through the 90-minute programme, broadcast from the Dutch city of Maastricht, an organiser announced that 10,000 tweets a minute were coming in.

The harder question to answer is whether any candidate did enough to convince potential voters that the elections will truly make a difference in a EU blighted by a long recession, mass unemployment and a squeezed welfare state.

Although the debate never turned nasty, Ska Keller, the Greens candidate, got in a sharp jab at Jean-Claude Juncker, the centre-right candidate, when she accused him of “presiding over a tax haven” during his time as prime minister of Luxembourg. An indignant Mr Juncker rejected the charge and managed later to slip in the image-softening remark that one reason why he favoured a EU-wide minimum wage was that he remembered his father’s tough life as a steelworker.

Guy Verhofstadt, a former Belgian prime minister who is the centrist, liberal candidate, turned his fire on José Manuel Barroso, the outgoing Commission president, saying Mr Barroso had never taken a decision without first flying to Berlin and Paris to get the green light. “The Commission needs to lead,” he thundered.

He also put Mr Juncker on the spot by challenging him to explain why his centre-right group still included Silvio Berlusconi, the former Italian prime minister, who caused outrage last weekend by suggesting Germans denied the existence of Nazi concentration camps. But Mr Juncker hit back with the succinct sentence: “I was sickened by the statements of Mr Berlusconi.”

Martin Schulz, the centre-left candidate, made a valiant effort to distinguish himself from the other three by repeating on several occasions that he was against a Europe of “banks and speculators”.

When the debate moved on to Europe’s insurgent far-right parties, he spoke with some passion in saying he found it “unimaginable” as a German that “a Nazi party could sit in the European parliament and make propaganda for the party of Adolf Hitler”.

Read more: Candidates spar in live EU TV debate | Brussels blog

European Elections: Europe's main broadcasters snub EU presidency debate - by Dave Keating

On 10 May, Europe's main television stations will broadcast the Eurovision Song Contest – the annual song competition staged by the European Broadcasting Union (EBU).

But five days later, a first-of-its-kind political debate between candidates to be the next European Commission President, staged by the EBU, will be relegated to special interest channels or news networks.

The EBU is the umbrella organisation for all national public broadcasters in Europe, and the intent was for the debate to be aired on at least second-tier stations. However most broadcasters have opted to air the debate on obscure stations.

Until this week, it appeared that the debate would not be broadcast in France at all, with all French broadcasters refusing to air it. Yesterday TV5 announced it would carry the debate. However TV5 is technically not a French broadcaster but rather a ‘global broadcaster in the French language'.

German public broadcasters ARD and ZDF have decided to feature the debate on a little-watched special interest channel called Phoenix. British public broadcaster BBC has decided to feature the debate on BBC Parliament, a little-watched 24-hour channel monitoring the British Parliament, similar to C-Span in the United States.

As of today (2 May), five member states have no plans to air the debate at all – Hungary, Slovenia, Latvia, Estonia and Cyprus. Swedish broadcaster SVT will not air the debate live, but will run a recorded version at some point before the election. Spain and Italy will air the broadcast on their 24-hour news stations. The debate will be aired in two non-EU countries – Canada and Ukraine.

Deutsche Welle, an international 24-hour news network in the German language, will also air the debate, along with European cable news station Euronews. 

Read more: Europe's main broadcasters snub EU presidency debate | European Voice

9/14/13

Back To The European Community - by Rene Cuperus

The European Union needs a strong dose of John Gray philosophy. The European Project as it has developed over the years needs a strong antidote against hybris. An antidote against imperial overstretch. An antidote against technocratic materialism and the Brussels ‘one size fits all’ tyranny. And a Gray-ish antidote against naïve and dangerous utopian thinking. John Gray’s thoughts (and work) stand for a realistic common sense filter. For modesty. Self- constraint. And self-criticism.  

That’s what the European Project utterly needs, if it ever wants to be able to reconnect to the hearts and minds of the majority of the European people.

No misunderstanding. History forced us to become Europeans, to be Europeans. The historical legacy of Europe in the 20th century should lead to intensive forms of cooperation, cross-border coordination between European nation states, to overcome national superiority thinking, ethnic definitions of national identity or cultural hostility.

History transformed us, Dutchmen, French, English, Swedes & Poles into Europeans. The bloody European civil war 1914-1945, the Communist and Nazi occupation, have made Europe into a ‘’language community’’. The common language being about war and oppression, persecution and lack of freedom. Being European means that one feels obliged to do everything possible never to let European peoples get into violent conflict, or under occupation, again.

That’s fair enough. Europeans we should be and have to be. But only to a certain extent. To certain limits. Defined by the radius of action of democracy, solidarity, shared values and cultural understanding.

Is Eutopia, the European Dream of Unity, the right and only answer to that? That remains the big question. Especially in these days of the eurocrisis.

Without such a fundamental debate about the future of the European project, the pan-European revolt of populism will gain more and more momentum.

Read more: Back To The European Community!

1/23/13

Netherlands has turned into a Super Cayman style Tax Haven as Yahoo, Dell Swell Netherlands’ $13 Trillion Tax Haven

Inside Reindert Dooves’s home, a 17th- century, three-story converted warehouse along the Zaan canal in suburban Amsterdam, a 21st-century Internet giant is avoiding taxes.

The bookkeeper’s home office doubles as the headquarters for a Yahoo! Inc. (YHOO) offshore unit. Through this sun-filled, white- walled room, Yahoo has taken advantage of the law to quietly funnel hundreds of millions of dollars in global profits to island subsidiaries, cutting its worldwide tax bill.

The Yahoo arrangement illustrates that the Netherlands, in the heart of a continent better known for social welfare than corporate welfare, has emerged as one of the most important tax havens for multinational companies. Now, as a deficit-strapped Europe raises retirement ages and taxes on the working class, the Netherlands’ role as a $13 trillion relay station on the global tax-avoiding network is prompting a backlash.

The Dutch Parliament is scheduled to debate the fairness of its tax system today. Lawmakers from several parties, including members of the country’s governing coalition, say they want to remove a stain on the nation’s reputation.

“We should not be a tax haven,” said Ed Groot, a parliament member from the Labour Party, which along with the People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy took power in November. Both ruling parties are “fed up with these so called PO Box companies,” he said. “If they go somewhere else we are not sorry at all because they spoil the name of Holland. Otherwise you can wait for retaliation measures and this we don’t want ".

Last month, the European Commission, the European Union’s executive body, declared a war on tax avoidance and evasion, which it said costs the EU 1 trillion euros a year. The commission advised member states -- including the Netherlands -- to create tax-haven blacklists and adopt anti-abuse rules.

It also recommended reforms that could undermine the lure of the Netherlands, and hurt a spinoff industry that has mushroomed in and around Amsterdam to abet tax avoidance.

Attracted by the Netherlands’ lenient policies and extensive network of tax treaties, companies such as Yahoo, Google Inc. (GOOG), Merck & Co. and Dell Inc. have moved profits through the country. Using techniques with nicknames such as the “Dutch Sandwich,” multinational companies routed 10.2 trillion euros in 2010 through 14,300 Dutch “special financial units,” according to the Dutch Central Bank. Such units often only exist on paper, as is allowed by law.

Profit shifting into tax havens by corporations costs the U.S. $90 billion a year, according to Kimberly Clausing, an economics professor at Reed College in Portland, Oregon. The U.S. faces a projected budget deficit of almost $1 trillion in fiscal 2013.

The Paris-based Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development -- which sets standards for how multinational companies allocate taxable income around the world -- is also tackling the issue. It’s discussing a proposal that could make it harder for companies to move profits through the Netherlands into island tax havens.

Read more: Yahoo, Dell Swell Netherlands’ $13 Trillion Tax Haven - Bloomberg

10/17/12

US Presidential Elections: Obama, Romney in crackling debate - by Steve Peoples and David Espo

An aggressive President Barack Obama accused challenger Mitt Romney of peddling a "sketchy deal" to fix the U.S. economy and playing politics with the deadly terrorist attack in Libya in a Tuesday night debate crackling with energy and emotion just three weeks before the election.

Romney pushed back hard, saying the middle class "has been crushed over the last four years" under Obama's leadership and that 23 million Americans are still struggling to find work. He contended the death of the U.S. ambassador to Libya was part of an unraveling of the administration's foreign policy.

The president was feistier from the outset than he had been in their initial encounter two weeks ago, when he turned in a listless performance that sent shudders through his supporters and helped fuel a rise by Romney in opinion polls nationally and in some battleground states.

When Romney said Tuesday night that he had a five-point plan to create 12 million jobs, Obama said, "Gov. Romney says he's got a five-point plan. Gov. Romney doesn't have a five-point plan. He has a one-point plan. And that plan is to make sure that folks at the top play by a different set of rules."

READ MORE: The Associated Press: Face to face: Obama, Romney in crackling debate

10/12/12

European Opinion: Joe Biden beat Paul Ryan to disrupt Republican momentum in an episode of the Generation Game

Fabulous! Joe Biden for President! Vote Biden! Oh. Wait a second…

For Democrats, the task last night was to disrupt the substantial momentum of the Republican campaign following Mitt Romney’s trouncing of Barack Obama in the first debate. For Republicans, the task was to continue or even accelerate that momentum.

Overall, Democrats have more reason to be happy than Republicans. Joe Biden was assertive, funny, absolutely on top of his brief, and just condescending enough. He was also – crucially, from a Democrat point of view – able to manoeuvre the debate towards foreign policy, and an area where the Democrats are safe because of the rightly perceived success of Obama’s first-term foreign policy. The more this election is about foreign policy, and the less it is about economics, the better the Democrats’ chances. And yet it should also be granted that Biden’s best moments came when he took apart Ryan’s budget proposals – supposedly the area where the young pretender is strongest.

To a greater extent than previously noticed in this campaign, last night also highlighted a weird generation game. Leading the tickets are Obama (51) and Romney (65). Second on the tickets are Joe Biden (69) and Paul Ryan (42). In other words, the Democrat ticket is “Youth and Experience”, whereas the Republican ticket is “Experience and Youth”.

The President fought the last election as an agent of change and the Cool Kid. Last night, Biden showed him how to play the Comeback Kid. That’s a bit weird coming from a guy who entered the Senate in 1973.

What Biden showed last was an emotional intensity that Obama conspicuously lacked last week. He looked and sounded convincingly like someone absolutely on the side of America’s striving middle-class, and the jobless and elderly and poor who have taken such a battering over the past four years.

Read more: Joe Biden beat Paul Ryan to disrupt Republican momentum in an episode of the Generation Game - Comment - Voices - The Independent

10/4/12

US Presidential Elections: Mitt Romney Comes Out Swinging in First Presidential Debate - "but his investment promises are mathematically impossible""

The debate in Denver was the first of three debates the two candidates will have between them over the next four weeks before Election Day. Their initial meeting was wonky in its discussion of policy details and failed to produce any real fireworks, with both candidates returning to well tread talking points.

Romney appeared more relaxed than Obama, who spent much of his time explaining policies he would likely rather be done selling by now. He hardly looked Romney in the eye during the debate.

There is one critical caveat, of course, in determining the winner of a debate: It's difficult to know how the millions of voters, whose prisms are radically different than those of mainstream reporters, took in the debate. But, at minimum, Romney cleared the most critical bar, by appearing presidential.

Still, one issue continued to plague Romney: details. While he said he would end Obama programs, he was vague on how he would do so without eliminating a host of components he pledged to keep.
"At some point, you have to ask, is he keeping all these plans to replace [programs] secret because they're too good?" Obama said. "Families are going benefit too much from them?"

Though there was no knock-out punch, observers rated Romney as the stronger debater tonight. 

EU-Digest


5/2/12

French Presidential elections: Sarkozy unable to land knockout punch to Hollande in three hr TV debate

Trailing Hollande in opinion polls by six to 10 points before Sunday's decisive runoff Sarkozy needed a knockout punch in this three hour TV debate to turn the tables. It did not happen.

"Sarkozy needs to swing 1.5 million people to his side. It won't be easy, but that doesn't mean it's impossible," Bernard Sananes, head of the CSA polling institute told a TV station

The duel was carried live on channels that reach roughly half France's 44.5 million voters.

Hollande appeared more confident and relaxed through most of the exchanges, saying he aimed to be "the president of justice", "the president of revival" and "the president of unity", and copying the Obama  2008 slogan, "the president of change".

Sarkozy, struggling to keep his job, came out slugging, assailing Socialist Hollande's plans to raise taxes and boost spending, repeatedly accusing him of lying. The Socialist Hollande held his own in a fight that many expected would be dominated by the sharp-tongued Sarkozy.

Interesting was both candidates strong support for the European Union even though they disagreed on details related to the application of the EU financial pact and the policies of the European central bank

EU-Digest