Advertise On EU-Digest

Annual Advertising Rates
Showing posts with label Libya. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Libya. Show all posts

7/23/20

Middle East: France's Macron slams Turkey's 'criminal' role in Libya

France's president has accused Turkey of importing large numbers of fighters into Libya, labelling Ankara's intervention "criminal".

Emmanuel Macron also lambasted Russian President Vladimir Putin's ambivalence towards his country's mercenaries operating in the oil-rich North African state.

Turkey has recently intervened decisively in Libya, providing air support, weapons, and allied fighters from Syria to help the internationally recognised government based in Tripoli repel a 14-month assault by renegade eastern commander Khalifa Haftar.

Read more at:
France's Macron slams Turkey's 'criminal' role in Libya | News | Al Jazeera

7/17/20

Middle East: Libya 'one hell of a mess' as civil war spirals into international free-for-all


Libya's new leaders had called for "forgiveness, tolerance and reconciliation."

Nine years later, there is very little of that. The UN seems powerless, and civilians are once again suffering.

Some 350,000 have been displaced inside the country. Tens of thousands risk dangerous sea crossings into Europe, where they are barely tolerated if they make it at all.

Libya's civil war continues, spiralling into an international free-for-all.

Read more at:
Libya 'one hell of a mess' as civil war spirals into international free-for-all | CBC News

7/13/20

Middle East - Libya: China in Libya - investments and neutrality

Among world and regional powers involved in the Libyan crisis, China is often not considered very much because it is not sending mercenaries to the country or mobilizing drones for air raids, like the United Arab Emirates, Turkey and Russia.

Beijing, however, is ''constantly investing'' at an economic level and is ''exercising influence in ways that promote the integration of Libya within China's global ambitions'', according to an article published by the ''Carnegie Endowment for International Peace'', a leading US think tank.

When the uprising against Muammar Gaddafi's began in 2011, Beijing abstained from voting when the Security Council authorized military intervention which opened the crisis that is still ongoing, noted the website of the organization that publishes ''Foreign Policy'', one of the most widely read magazines in the world on foreign politics and economics.

It was a position that, along with countering US influence, reflected ''its calculated neutrality in Libya'', according to two analysts from the organization, who highlighted in the article that the involvement of the Asian superpower ''focused on economic penetration, its strongest line of influence and diplomacy behind the scenes''.

Read more at: 
China in Libya - investments and neutrality - Analysis - ANSAMed.it

6/22/20

NATO: France and Turkey fracture Nato on Libya - "as Erdogan plays a dangerous game he could lose"- by Andrew Rettman

"Who cares about the EU or NATO ? Trump  agrees with me !"
Nato is to investigate French allegations that Turkish warships targeted a French one in a confrontation over the Libya conflict, which has divided allies.


"The incident in the Mediterranean [Sea] was addressed in the meeting by several allies", Nato secretary general Jens Stoltenberg said after Nato defence ministers held video-talks on Thursday (18 June).

"We have made sure that Nato military authorities are investigating the incident to bring full clarity to what happened," he said.

Turkish warships locked their weapons systems on to a French frigate called the Courbet, which was part of a Nato monitoring mission called Sea Guardian, on 10 June, according to France.

And they did it in order to slip through yet another illegal shipment of arms to Turkey's ally in the Libya civil war, the Tripoli-based Government of National Accord (GNA), France said.

Note EU-Digest:  Curious - Whenever, or each time we put the President of Turkey's name ,Erdogan into the "Labels" column of our blog (EU-Digest), we were posting, the blog reported an error, and we had to go back and re-post the entire content of the blog, and rewrite the "labels"  removing Erdogan's name for it to work. Does this mean censorship by either some internal or external "source", or is it a real technical error? This is not the first time it happened when other sensitive issues were published.

Read more at:
France and Turkey fracture Nato on Libya

6/16/20

EU to coordinate request for NATO’s participation in Libya mission – Alexandra Brzozowski and Sarantis Michalopoulos

EU foreign minister met on Monday (15 June) with their US counterpart, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, amid a widening transatlantic rift over Israel and requests from some member states to step up cooperation on Libya.

During the meeting, some EU member states brought up the issue of the situation in the Eastern Mediterranean where the EU is “increasingly concerned about the recent escalations from Turkey,” EU’s chief diplomat Josep Borrell told reporters in Brussels.

“In any case, the situation is becoming worse,” Borrell admitted.

Asked whether Pompeo agreed to send a “transatlantic message” to Turkey, Borrell said the US side has been “considering the situation in the Mediterranean, but mainly in relation to the situation in Libya”.

Asked how the US is going to be involved and what other steps could be taken on Turkey’s behaviour, Borrell said the next EU foreign affairs minister’s meeting “will put the issue of our relations with Turkey on the agenda”.

However, while ministers “haven’t gone into detail on the situation in Libya” during their exchange, EU defence ministers are set to discuss Libya and Operation Irini on Tuesday (16 June).

“Allies are currently discussing how NATO could support the EU’s new maritime mission Irini,” a NATO official said. “It is important that the UN arms embargo is fully implemented.”

NATO member Turkey has strongly backed the Government of National Accord (GNA) of Fayez al-Sarraj, which in recent weeks has recaptured all remaining outposts in western Libya from pro-Haftar loyalists, who had sought to seize the capital Tripoli in a 14-month offensive.

On the other hand, Turkey has reacted negatively to Operation Irini before, saying it was biased, as there is no similar arms embargo on Libya’S southern land border, from where it is believed that pro-Haftar loyalists are getting their weapons to fight the GNA.

Note EU-Digest: "The EU should  use their own new combined naval forces IRINI to enforce the UN arms embargo on Libya if the US/NATO does not have the courage to tell Turkey's Erdogan to get out of Libya. It The EU should  use their own new combined naval forces IRINI to enforce the UN arms embargo on Libya if the US/NATO does not have the courage to tell Turkey's Erdogan to get out of Libya. It also shows once again that it is high time for the EU NATO member states to get their own defense force operating asap, and pull out of the outdated and dysfunctional NATO alliance spearheaded by the US . Case in point, NATO member Turkey, even though it is a member of NATO, unfortunately, in name only. For some time now,Turkey under Erdogan's leadership has acted as the "lone ranger".in the NATO. All we have to do is look at is Turkey's invasion of Syria and now Turkey's adventures in Libya. Is Erdogan trying to revive the Ottoman Empire ? ".

Read more: 
EU to coordinate request for NATO’s participation in Libya mission – EURACTIV.com

5/14/20

Middle East: Pandemic 'shock' could destabilise Middle East, EU fears - by Andrew Rettman

The economic "shock" of the pandemic could aggravate crises on Europe's southern fringe, EU diplomats fear, amid other concerns on Israeli annexation.

"From a political perspective, the impact of the pandemic may exacerbate the many existing crises affecting the [Middle East and North Africa] region," the EU foreign service said in an internal report on 8 May, seen by EUobserver.

The Syria war "may also see another wave of refugees towards Europe", it noted. "The tragedy of the conflict only deteriorates in Yemen," it added.

Other countries in the region also risked instability due to the "triple parallel shock on [falling] revenues, from oil, tourism, and remittances", the EU report warned.

"All this may result in increased risk of social upheavals, jeopardising security and stability in the region" and create "tensions between secularists and Islamists," it said.

"The plummeting oil price will have huge impact in Algeria," it noted.
"Iraq, due to the combination of political instability, insecurity, and low oil prices stands out as a country the EU should focus its attention on," it said.

"The pandemic can only worsen things in the protracted Libya crisis", it said.

Read more at: Pandemic 'shock' could destabilise Middle East, EU fears

2/25/20

Middle East: Libya is test of EU geopolitics, ex-UN inspector says- by Andrew Rettman

Chinese drones smuggled in by the United Arab Emirates (UAE) doing battle with Turkish drones.

Growing numbers of covert foreign troops to operate high-tech equipment.

Read more at: Libya is test of EU geopolitics, ex-UN inspector says

2/19/20

Middle East: Russia, Turkey, Iran reassert glory of past empires in today's Middle East - by Jack Cohen

Three countries – Russia, Turkey and Iran – are currently trying to reassert their former influence and glory, harking back to the power and greatness of the former Czarist/Soviet, Ottoman and Persian empires, respectively. In many ways these three imperial states, led by autocratic leaders – President Vladimir Putin, President Recep Erdogan, and Ayatollah Khamenei, respectively – are similar and have found it convenient to collaborate in some matters. But, in most ways these leaders and their putative empires are very competitive.

The difference between these three intended empires and the USA is very stark. While the US is really the only superpower, President Donald Trump has enunciated a policy of withdrawal from the Middle East, the main area of big power conflicts, even though his mantra is “Make America Great Again.” In this policy he continues that of his predecessor, Barack Obama, who also had a policy of retraction from the Middle East. By contrast, Russia, Turkey and Iran are all in an expansionist phase, particularly in that region.

The difference between these three intended empires and the USA is very stark. While the US is really the only superpower, President Donald Trump has enunciated a policy of withdrawal from the Middle East, the main area of big power conflicts, even though his mantra is “Make America Great Again.” In this policy he continues that of his predecessor, Barack Obama, who also had a policy of retraction from the Middle East. By contrast, Russia, Turkey and Iran are all in an expansionist phase, particularly in that region.

They see the Arab countries as weak and exploitable, and two of them, Iran and Turkey, seek to reassert their former spheres of control there. Russia, it is said, has always sought a warm water port in the Mediterranean Sea, and in fact Obama’s incompetence gifted that to Putin.

When he declared his red line over the Syrian regime’s use of chemical weapons, and then instead allowed Putin to come into Syria to mediate the removal of those weapons from Assad, he released a monster. Putin got his port at Latakia and then an airfield, and then participated in the fighting with Assad’s regime and saved it from the brink of defeat and brought it to victory, at the cost of millions of lives.

Syria is now effectively a vassal state of Russia, and Putin will decide its fate.Iran has also been active in Syria, through its Quds Force of the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), whose former leader, Gen. Qasem Soleimani, was assassinated by the US.

There is a relationship between Assad, who comes from the Alawite minority in Syria, and the Shia from Iran. But we should see that as an ideological excuse to justify Iranian expansionism into the Arab world. Although they would be loath to admit it, Shi’ism is a cloak for the reassertion of Iranian power in the region formerly part of the Persian Empire. Its influence now extends to Yemen, where Iran supports the Houthi rebels; Iraq, where it controls the Popular Mobilization Forces; and Lebanon, where Hezbollah is its dependent proxy.

Turkey under Erdogan has been veering away from the democratic Westernized Turkey that Kemal Ataturk foresaw, toward a Sunni religious format. In doing so, he has taken on the dubious role of reconstituting the Ottoman Empire. He has entered the Syrian morass, defeated the Kurdish forces and occupied a 30-kilometer stretch of Syrian territory where he claims he intends to settle some of the millions of Syrian evacuees in his country.

He controls northern Cyprus, and his latest move is into Libya, where he has agreed to support the supposedly legitimate government in Benghazi in exchange for oil exploitation rights in the Mediterranean. Meanwhile Russia is supporting the insurgent army of Gen. Khalifa Haftar, who controls Tripoli and much of Libya.

The reduction of American presence and power in the Middle East, coupled with a reluctance to use that power, has resulted in the proverbial power vacuum. This has enticed these three states to exercise their own expansionist dreams, fueling their own versions of “Make X Great Again,” where X=Russia, Turkey and Iran. How these imperial designs and competitions will play out remains to be seen.

Note EU-Digest: Russia in fact has now taken over the US leadership position in he Middle East,  assisted by Assad and Erdogan. As a result Erdogan has thereby created a major breach on NATO's Southern flank, by aligning himself with Putin, making the creation of an independent EU military force, and kicking Turkey out of the NATO an urgent requirement...  . 

Read more at: Russia, Turkey, Iran reassert glory of past empires in today's Middle Eas - The Jerusalem Post

1/20/20

EU plans to refocus ′Sophia′ naval mission on Libya

Following a meeting of EU foreign ministers, the EU's foreign policy chief has said EU countries have agreed to "refocus" the bloc's Mediterranean naval mission on enforcing an arms embargo on Libya.

Read more at :
https://www.dw.com/en/eu-plans-to-refocus-sophia-naval-mission-on-libya/a-52067545

1/5/20

Turkey begins deploying troops to Libya, says Erdogan

Ankara has announced the deployment of troops to Libya. Turkish forces will support the internationally-recognized government in Tripoli, which is under siege by the army of General Khalifa Haftar.

Read more at :
https://www.dw.com/en/turkey-begins-deploying-troops-to-libya-says-erdogan/a-51894454

1/2/20

Turkey - Libya relations: Turkish parliament backs govt plan to send troops to Libya in emergency session

The Turkish parliament has voted to approve a plan to send troops to support the UN-recognized government in Libya as it continues to fight forces loyal to a rival government in the eastern part of the country. 
Lawmakers approved the motion, which grants a one-year mandate for the troop deployment, in an emergency session on Thursday. The motion passed by 325 votes to 184.

The plan was opposed by Turkey's main opposition party, the Republican Peoples’ Party (CHP), which said sending troops could aggravate the situation and embroil Ankara in another conflict.

Read more: Turkish parliament backs govt plan to send troops to Libya in emergency session — RT World News

12/29/19

Middle East: EU divisions over Libya leave a gap for others

Libya is in turmoil and no political solution is in sight. The EU's inability to take concerted action in the country, meanwhile, is being exploited by third parties, such as Turkey.

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan wants to militarily support the Tripoli-based Libyan government — which is recognized by the UN — in its fight against militia commander Khalifa Haftar. And if Turkish parliament signs off on his proposal in the next few days, Erdogan might get his will.

Read more: EU divisions over Libya leave a gap for others | Middle East| News and analysis of events in the Arab world | DW | 29.12.2019

4/7/19

Libya: US pulls frces out of Libya

Libya: US pulls forces amid fighting near capital


Read more at :
https://p.dw.com/p/3GQQM

9/26/17

Venezuela calls US travel ban psychological terrorism -

Venezuela has accused the US of "psychological terrorism" after it imposed travel restrictions on some Venezuelan government officials and their families. 

The foreign ministry said travel bans like the one announced on Sunday were incompatible with international law.

The ban on eight countries includes Venezuela for the first time.
US President Donald Trump said the countries on the list had "inadequate" security protocols.

Chad, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Syria, Venezuela and Yemen are all now subject to US travel bans.

Note EU-Digest: One can question why Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Libya, Pakistan are also not on that list? 

Read more: US travel ban is psychological terrorism - Venezuela - BBC News

8/4/17

Italian ship arrives in Tripoli port despite threat - by Mohammed Al Araby

The Libyan navy chief off staff’s media office has released a video of an Italian navy ship arriving to the port of Tripoli, while stressing that its arrival does not impede on the Libya’s sovereignty.

The Libyan Naval Command said in a statement on its Facebook page that the visit comes as part of a bilateral military cooperation agreement signed in 2008. Furthermore the statement added that it is the ‘right’ of the Libyan navy and coast guard to get technical and logistical support from their Italian counterparts.

The arrival comes after a call was made by the General Command of the Libyan National Army to bomb any vessel entering Libyan territorial waters.

Read more: Italian ship arrives in Tripoli port despite threat - Al Arabiya English

8/3/17

Middle East: Russia in Libya: War or Peace? - by Mattia Toaldo

Libya is increasingly a target for Russia’s growing ambitions to influence the Middle East and North Africa, but, judging by the Kremlin’s actions thus far, Putin is either hedging his bets or has not yet decided on his objectives for this file. European decisions – particularly those by the most active players, France, the UK, and Italy - could yet tip the scales in one direction of the other. Watching closely will be the new UN Special Representative of the Secretary General for Libya, Ghassan Salamé, who officially starts work this week after attending last Tuesday’s Paris summit between the internationally-recognised Libyan Prime Minister Faiez Serraj and his main rival, General Khalifa Haftar.

On the one hand, Russia is naturally drawn towards supporting General Haftar, who opposes the Western-backed Prime Minister Serraj and is considered by many in Moscow as ‘the strongman of eastern Libya’. Haftar’s anti-Islamist stance makes him an attractive counterterrorism partner, and support for the general also strengthens Russia’s relationship with his main sponsor, Egypt. Limited support for Haftar also drags the conflict out, enabling Russia to point to the folly of the West’s intervention in 2011 and make the case that regime change, in Libya as in Ukraine, only breeds chaos.

On the other hand, Putin wants to be seen both at home and abroad as more than a military actor and is seeking to burnish his diplomatic credentials. Having demonstrated his military strength in Syria, playing the role of peace-maker in Libya could be attractive for Putin, particularly with presidential elections on the horizon in March 2018. Moreover, a Russian-led diplomatic success would allow Putin to position himself as mending what the West has broken.

Putin is unlikely to let Russia be dragged in a new conflict or to upset Egypt by dealing directly with Haftar on weapons. What could change is the quality of Russian support for Haftar, with a higher level of technical assistance or more sophisticated weapons. This would greatly encourage Haftar to pursue war, however unrealistic a quick military victory by Haftar is.

Putin will probably continue with his current ambiguous policy: minimal but important military support to Haftar through arms deliveries via Egypt (thus keeping both Sisi and Haftar happy); showing Russia’s diplomatic clout by occasionally inviting some Libyan leader to Moscow; while continuing to use Libya as a cautionary tale against the evils of regime change.

If European actors like Italy, France and the UK want to avoid escalation, Russian diplomatic ambitions provide some leverage. Russian decision makers expect to be involved in international discussions on Libya just as they are in the Syria negotiations and in other regional formats such as the Middle East Peace Process Quartet. And while the UN and Salamé have little choice but to engage Russia, meaningful talks between EU member states and Moscow on Libya should not be granted for free. Russia’s inclusion in a new contact group should be made conditional on Russian support for de-escalation in Libya: reduce support for Haftar, or be left out in the cold.

Ultimately, Putin’s ambiguity on Libya so far is good reason to be suspicious of his true intentions. And Europe must use its diplomatic leverage to ensure that increased Russian involvement does not come at the cost of further destabilisation on Europe’s southern border.

Russia in Libya: War or Peace? | European Council on Foreign Relations

6/19/17

Refugees: Record 65.6 million 'forcibly displaced' in 2016 - UN Global Trends Report Shows

Conflict or persecution forced a record 65.6 million people worldwide to flee their homes by the end of 2016. That equates to one person displaced every three seconds.

The United Nations released the figure on Monday (June 19), the eve of World Refugee Day.

According to the findings of its Global Trends report, children under the age of 18 make up over half of the refugee population.

Unaccompanied or separated minors – largely from Afghanistan or Syria – lodged around 75,000 applications in 70 countries last year, although it is thought this figure could be higher, due to incomplete data.

While around half a million people returned to their countries of origin, an estimated ten million are believed to be stateless.

These statistics are not only deplorable, but also show what a terrible effect conflicts around the world have had on these figures. The blame for this drama squarely rest on the shoulders of governments in the West, East, and Middle East, who have financed these proxy wars. It is a blatant fact, even if none of these countries ever is willing to admit it.   

For the complete UN report click here