Advertise On EU-Digest

Annual Advertising Rates
Showing posts with label Aircraft Safety. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Aircraft Safety. Show all posts

3/10/14

Technology: The mystery of flight MH370: How on earth, with all our technology, do we lose a giant plane? - by Sebastian Anthony

Three days ago, Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 vanished from radar off the south coast of Vietnam in the South China Sea. 239 people were on board — and at this point, it is presumed that they have all perished in some kind of disaster. A massive search and rescue effort involving 40 ships and 34 aircraft from nine different nations has yet to discover any sign of the missing aircraft. For me, this is almost incomprehensible:

Despite all of the awesome technology that mankind has developed, it’s still possible for a Boeing 777-200 with 239 people on board to vanish. For me, it’s mind blowing that all we have to go on is the plane’s radar signature — and even then, that last radar reading was so poor that the search area is thousands of square miles of open water. Surely, given the fact that we can track a damn smartphone anywhere on Earth down to a few meters, there’s a better way of keeping track of missing aircraft?

In the words of Malaysia’s civil aviation chief, the fate of MH370 is “a mystery.” The Boeing 777 took off from Kuala Lumpur in Malaysia en route to Beijing, was cruising normally at 35,000 feet… and then disappeared. There was no distress call. The weather was fine. The plane’s last known position, via radar, was just south of Vietnam in the South China Sea — which is where search efforts have been focused so far — but one theory suggests that the plane turned back just after the last radar ping, meaning the plane could be hundreds of miles away in the Strait of Malacca. In the absence of any other information, there is speculation that the plane was target of a terrorist attack. 

For me, the most shocking aspect of the MH370 disaster is that we won’t know what fate befell those 239 souls until we find MH370′s Flight Data Recorder (FDR), aka the black box. Except for that last radar reading, we have absolutely no knowledge of the flight at all until we find that FDR. We have no clue what was said in the cockpit by the captain and first officer — though, seemingly, if something did go wrong, they didn’t even have time to send a mayday message. We have no clue if the plane hit a patch of bad weather, or whether it was hijacked. It really will be one huge mystery until the FDR is recovered — and there’s a good chance, if MH370 did crash into the ocean, that the FDR will never be recovered. In the case of Air France flight AF447, which disappeared off the coast of Brazil, it took two months to locate the wreckage, more than a year to find the Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR), and the FDR was never found.

So, think about this for a moment. We live in a day and age where GPS (and other radio triangulation methods) can track your smartphone to within a few meters, almost anywhere on Earth. With dedicated, land-based tracking networks, vehicles and devices can be tracked to within a few centimeters. Even in the absence of GPS or radio tracking, inertial guidance (dead reckoning) has been accurate enough since the ’60s to accurately land a nuclear ICBM on the other side of the planet, or put the Apollo mission into space. (Read: Think GPS is cool? IPS will blow your mind.)

And then there’s connectivity. On land, there are networks (both commercial and governmental) that provide data connectivity almost everywhere. Over water is definitely harder, but satellites do provide pretty good coverage — and yes, that particular region of Asia is very well covered by communications satellites. Finally, even if an aircraft is out of satellite/radio coverage, there is absolutely nothing preventing the airplane from transmitting a really juicy low-frequency radio signal that could be picked up thousands of miles away. This is how they communicate with air traffic control, after all.

Why, then, does a plane like the MH370 keep all of its secrets locked up in a black box? Why don’t planes constantly transmit all of their black box data, so that we know their exact location, bearing, altitude, and other important factors, at all times?

The short answer is, there’s no good reason.

Read more: The mystery of flight MH370: How on earth, with all our technology, do we lose a giant plane? | ExtremeTech

8/18/13

Aircraft Safety: Airlines ordered to inspect beacons after Boeing 787 fire


Transport Canada has ordered airlines to inspect the emergency beacons on their aircraft in the wake of a July 12 fire on a Boeing 787 at London’s Heathrow Airport.

The Canadian regulator said inspections should take place on a broad range of planes that have Honeywell beacons, including Boeing, Airbus, McDonnell Douglas, ATR, Lockheed Martin Corp and Dassault Aviation.

British investigators are still determining the cause of a fire aboard a parked Boeing 787 owned by Ethiopian Airlines, but they found pinched wires on a Honeywell emergency locator transmitter.

Read more: Airlines ordered to inspect beacons after Boeing 787 fire - Business - CBC News

4/30/13

Air Trafic Safety: Airbus plane came close to crashing into possible 'UFO' flying over Glasgow - by Rob Cooper

A passenger plane came within 300 feet of crashing into a 'UFO' flying over Glasgow, an official investigation has found.

The plane was less than 10 seconds away from hitting the object as it flew over Baillieston on the outskirts of Glasgow at 3,500ft and prepared to land.

Despite an extensive investigation, the UK Airprox Board - which investigates reports of near misses - was unable to identify the 'blue and yellow' object which passed below the Airbus 320.

The pilot said: 'We seemed to only miss it by a couple of hundred feet it went directly beneath us - wherever we were when we called it in it was within about ten seconds; couldn't tell what direction it was going but it went right underneath us.'

Asked if he thought it was a glider, the pilot replied: 'well maybe a microlight - it just looked too big for a balloon.'

But the board ruled out any such aircraft and were baffled.

Read more: Airbus pilot on moment passenger plane came close to crashing into 'UFO' flying over Glasgow | Mail Online

1/16/13

Japan grounds 787 Dreamliners for safety checks

Boeing Co.'s 787 planes were grounded for safety checks Wednesday by two major Japanese airlines after one was forced to make an emergency landing in the latest blow for the new jet.

Boeing shares sank lower on the NYSE on Wednesday in reaction to the news, losing more than three per cent to $74.46.

All Nippon Airways said a cockpit message showed battery problems and a burning smell was detected in the cockpit and the cabin, forcing the 787 on a domestic flight to land at Takamatsu airport in western Japan.
\
The 787, known as the Dreamliner, is Boeing's newest and most technologically advanced jet, and the company is counting heavily on its success. Since its launch, which came after delays of more than three years, the plane has been plagued by a series of problems including a battery fire and fuel leaks. Japan's ANA and Japan Airlines are major customers for the jet and among the first to fly it.

Read more: Japan">http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/story/2013/01/16/japan-dreamliner-boeing-problem.html">Japan grounds 787 Dreamliners for safety checks - Business - CBC News

2/11/12

Aircraft Industry: Incorrect shim work in the aft fuselage of the new Boeng 787 requires repair

At stake is the possibility of delamination in the Section 48 aft fuselage barrel of the new Boeing 787 twin-engine jet. In some areas, Boeing found gaps between the barrel, which is a single piece of composite material—carbon fiber reinforced plastic–and the fuselage’s internal composite support structure. Small gaps are normally filled with spacers called shims to ensure a tight fit. A lose fit promotes delamination over time.
 
Boeing says incorrect shim work in the aft fuselage of the 787 is limited to four locations, is “well understood” and will be repaired concurrently with other planned work.

“There is no need to conduct inspections or repairs on in-service airplanes immediately,” the company says in a statement. “There is no short-term safety concern.” Only All Nippon Airways is flying the 787.

The issue came to light in late January and concerns structures made at Boeing’s factory in North Charleston, S.C., a former Vought Aircraft facility. The company is not saying how many of the 50-plus aircraft built so far have experienced the issue, but all will be inspected.

EU-Digest

12/26/11

Aircraft Safety: Turning off your electronic gadgets while in flight may be a good idea - by Adam Christy and Kelly Gross

A new investigation by USA today says that turning off your electronic gadgets while in flight, may not be necessary anymore.

Ernesto Martinez has been a pilot for 7 years, and he says no tool has made flying easier than his iPad. With maps, airplane and airport information, approach planes, and sectionals, Ernesto's iPad has everything he needs.

"If you have a large aircraft and there are many people on their phones, it can get into the cockpit,” said Martinez. The study looks at hundreds of documents that found electronic devices give of electromagnetic interference, but that the amount is small.


“Just turn it off, because you are really putting your life at risk,” says Martinez.


For more: A new investigation by USA today says that turning off your electronic gadgets while in flight, may not be necessary anymore. - KTXL