Food Labeling:The European Union specifically addresses the need for GE modified food contents to bear labels

Labeling GE foods is not a novel idea. The European Union specifically addresses the new properties and risks of biotech crops by requiring all food, animal feed and processed products with GE contents to bear labels. The EU is among nearly 50 developed countries that require the GE products they import from U.S. to be labeled. Furthermore, a 2012 Mellman Group study showed that 91% of U.S. voters favored GE labeling requirements.

“There is broad concern about the impact of GE foods on our environment and the publc has a right to know if the and their families are consuming GE products,” said Jeff Tittel, director of New Jersey Sierra Club. “This is no different than current labeling practices we have for preservatives, high fructose corn syrup or organic blueberries. Consumers have a right to know so they can make informed choices and that is what this legislation does.”

“We strongly urge the legislature to support the bill to label genetically engineered products. Consumers have the right to know the ingredients in the food they purchase,” said Lucia Huebner, vice president of the Northeast Organic Farmers Association of New Jersey. “We are very concerned about issues such as cross contamination of seeds, integrity of agricultural ecosystems, protection of native pollinators and the wellbeing of fa

Genetically modified food: GMO Lobbyists Costs Reach Over Half a Billion Dollars - by Dr. Mercola

In Europe genetically modified foods and ingredients have to be labeled.

In the United States, they do not. But the truth is, if and when GM labeling is finally required in the United States, you're going to see changes to the majority of food labels in your supermarket, as GM foods already widely appear in our food supply. Most people are not aware that nearly EVERY processed food you encounter at your local supermarket that does not bear the "USDA Organic" label is filled with GM components. This is due to the amount of GM crops now grown in the United States (over 90 percent of all corn is GM corn and over 95 percent all soy is GM soy).

In just over a decade, the food and agriculture biotechnology industry has spent more than $572 million in campaign contributions and lobbying expenditures, according to an analysis by Food & Water Watch. Key among the goals of this intense lobbying effort is to prevent GM food labeling and keep Americans in the dark about the contents of their food.

Over 95 percent of Americans polled said they think GM foods should require a label, stating it's an ethical issue and consumers should be able to make an informed choice. Like people in Europe, Americans are suspicious of GM foods, and a large part of why many continue to buy them is because they are unaware that they're already in the food. A prominent GM food label would be a death sentence to U.S. GM crops, which are right now enjoying a free for all when it comes to entering the food market.

It takes only a flick of biotech's wrist to move Congress' regulatory arms, and the truth is the revolving door between the two is spinning so fast that the line between industry lobbyists and legislators is permanently blurred.

As the Food and Water Watch report also  noted:

• Clarence Thomas, who did not withdraw himself from a Supreme Court decision on genetically engineered alfalfa last year, used to be the general counsel for Monsanto.
• Michael Taylor, who was formerly the vice president of Monsanto, is now the Food and Drug Administration Deputy Commissioner for Foods.
• Roger Beachy, the former director of the Monsanto-funded Danforth Plant Science Center in Saint Louis, is now the director of the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture.
• Islam Siddiqui was vice president of Monsanto and Dupont's funded pesticide-promotion group CropLife. He is now the agricultural negotiator for the U.S. Trade Representative. In other words, he is the enforcer for U.S. foreign policy that countries have to accept our genetically engineered exports.
• Rajiv Shah is the former Agricultural Development Director for the pro-biotech Gates Foundation, who are frequently partnering with Monsanto. He served as Obama's USDA undersecretary for Research, Education and Economics.
• Elena Kagan has served as President Obama's Solicitor General. She took Monsanto's side against organic farmers on the roundup ready alfalfa case.
• Ramona Ramiro, corporate counsel to Dupont, another biotech bully, has been nominated by President Obama to serve as general counsel for the USDA.

In the US this is one of the few issues where Republicans and Democrats have found that the economic benefits of backing GMO products are more important than the moral and health issues. As Cummins noted in his report, both parties are guilty.

Note EU-Digest: Unfortunately some EU parliamentarians and EU member state officials are also being "arm twisted" by US Food and Agricultural lobbyists. France's highest court on Monday overturned France's ban on growing a strain of genetically modified maize (corn) developed by U.S. biotech firm Monsanto, saying it was not sufficiently justified. France, the EU's largest grain producer whose citizens are among the staunchest biotech skeptics, banned growing of such crops in 2008 after protests by local green groups, citing a "serious risk to the environment."  Having tried and failed to force several EU countries to lift their cultivation bans, last year the Commission proposed letting member states decide themselves whether to grow or ban GMO crop cultivation.

Under European Union law, only two GMO varieties are approved for cultivation.

 For more: GMO Campaign Costs Reach Over Half a Billion Dollars

European lawmakers approve new "flawed" food labeling rules

European lawmakers gave the final nod on Wednesday to long-debated rules on food labeling aimed at giving consumers more and better information on the nutritional and energy content of products. The goal of the new regulation, which includes specific requirements for displaying information, is to make food labels more understandable and relevant to consumers and to help them make more informed buying decisions.

Some groups beg to differ, however. The consumer group Foodwatch, for instance, claims the food industry has successfully pushed through most of its demands – at the expense of consumers. "The labeling swindle continues," Foodwatch spokeswoman Christine Gross told Deutsche Welle.

Under the newly approved rules, country of origin, the energy content and amounts of fat, saturated fats, carbohydrates, sugar, protein and salt must be stated in a legible tabular form on the packaging, all together in the same field of vision. And the information must be expressed per 100 grams or 100 milliliters.


According to the World Health Organization, obesity has tripled in Europe since the 1980s, with rates still rising sharply, particularly among children. It is already responsible for 2 to 8 percent of health costs and 10 to 13 percent of deaths, depending on the region, according to the organization.


Unfortunately, say activists, the new EU regulation doesn't include the "traffic light" coloring scheme, already used by some UK retailers. Under the system, red, amber and green warning labels distinguish foods that are high in fat, saturated fats, sugar or salt. Green means "low" content, amber "medium" and red "high."

Corporate Europe Observatory, a Brussels-based transparency non-governmental organization, claims that European food and drink industries spent around 1 billion euros (US $1.4 billion) opposing the traffic-light system, believed to be one of the most expensive lobbying campaigns ever mounted in the EU.

For more: European lawmakers approve new food labeling rules | Business | Deutsche Welle | 07.07.2011