Advertise On EU-Digest

Annual Advertising Rates
Showing posts with label Social Security. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Social Security. Show all posts

1/29/23

The debt ceiling: action needed to increase the debt ceiling before a total US economic meltdown occurs

Just over a week ago, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen announced that the U.S. government had hit the limit on total federal borrowing allowed by law, also known as the debt ceiling. Unless Congress raises or does away with the debt limit soon, the federal government will go into default, triggering a global financial crisis that economists estimate will destroy 6 million jobs and $12 trillion in household wealth.1

Congress can defuse this time bomb by simply raising the debt limit, as it has dozens of times over the years, under presidents of both parties.

But Kevin McCarthy, Marjorie Taylor Greene, and the other MAGA radicals now in control of the House of Representatives are refusing to raise the debt ceiling unless President Biden agrees to deep cuts to Social Security and Medicare.

Read more at: https//www.eu-digest.blogspot.com


7/21/22

Russia: Social security and welfare in Russia: rates and benefits

Are you eligible for social security in Russia? Learn about the Russian social security system and contributions, plus how to get a Russian social security number and claim social welfare in Russia.

The Russia social security system is the responsibility of the state. The Ministry of Labor and Social Protection oversees most aspects of it. In some cases, expats with residency can claim benefits from social security in Russia if they paid the necessary payments into government funds.

If you are living in Russia or working in Russia for more than 183 days in a calendar year, you are obliged to pay contributions towards the Russian social security system. The funds you pay entitle you to claim certain Russian social welfare benefits, such as unemployment benefits, basic healthcare in Russia, maternity and child benefits, and a Russian pension, although conditions apply.

READ MORE AT: Social security and welfare in Russia: rates and benefits | Expatica

10/13/21

USA: The largest COLA hike in 40 years is coming to Social Security in 2022 --- what that means for your retirement

The cost-of-living adjustment in 2022 will be 5.9%, according to the Department of Labor. It will be the largest increase to COLA in 40 years, and a boost to Social Security beneficiaries’ checks.

For more than a decade, these adjustments have averaged below 2%, which in many cases has done little for Social Security beneficiaries – or nothing, in instances when their expenses have risen dramatically but their benefit checks have barely adjusted for inflation.

Read more at: The largest COLA hike in 40 years is coming to Social Security in 2022 --- what that means for your retirement - MarketWatch

6/30/20

USA: Social Security is under pressure, senior citizens are battling a health crisis — it’s not easy aging in America - by Alessandre Malito

Many Americans rely on Social Security for a majority of theirretirement income, yet the future of the program is riddled with uncertainties. And right now, senior citizens are disproportionately affected by the health risks posed by COVID-19.

And there are numerous ways to improve the lives of olderAmericans, said Max Richtman, president and chief executive officer ofthe National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare.

Read more at :
Social Security is under pressure, senior citizens are battling a health crisis — it’s not easy aging in America - MarketWatch

3/10/20

USA Payroll Tax Cut: Addressing coronavirus with a payroll tax cut won't help workers -

President Trump’s proposal to reduce Social Security payroll taxes to stimulate the economy in an election year is a colossally bad idea. No doubt, the president is worried about an economic downturn as the coronavirus epidemic intensifies — and the potential impact on his re-election campaign. But that is no reason to interfere with Social Security’s finances, especially at a time when the program faces future fiscal challenges

On Tuesday, the president tweeted that it would “great” for the “middle class” and the “USA” to temporarily cut payroll taxes — which means reducing the revenue flowing into Social Security. In fact, it would be anything but great for the millions of working people who pay into the program so that they can collect their earned benefits upon retirement, disability, or the death of a spouse. 

Today, more than 40 percent of seniors rely on Social Security for all or most of their income. Economic forecasts tell us that tomorrow’s retirees will rely on their Social Security benefits even more than today’s seniors do. How many would willingly trade their future financial security for a few dollars in payroll tax cuts?

Addressing coronavirus with a payroll tax cut won't help workers - Los Angeles Times

12/22/16

USA:SOCIAL SECURITY: Republican Introduces Legislation To Completely Gut Social Security - By Farron Cousins

Republicans in Washington, DC, are still trying to destroy Social Security. The latest attempt is the Social Security Reform Act of 2016, by House Ways and Means Social Security subcommittee chairman Sam Johnson. What Johnson is trying to do basically is essentially what he calls a restructuring of the Social Security system in the United States. By restructuring, he means reducing benefits for those who receive Social Security, while at the same time lowering the cap for wealthy Americans so that they actually pay less into the Social Security fund.

Now, their concern, allegedly, is that Social Security in the next 20 years is going to run out of money. It’s going to be paying out more than its taking in. That is a lie. That is not true. But, that’s the lie they’re going with, so let’s talk about this. If you’re afraid that this thing is going to run out of money, why would you go ahead and reduce the amount of money that people pay into it, because that’s what Johnson’s plan does. It lowers the cap for wealthy Americans, once they make over a certain amount, that amount is not taxed for Social Security. It’s going to lower that cap, so they will pay even less into Social Security. At the same time, beneficiaries who’ve made, I think, between $24,000 and $49,000 a year throughout their life, their benefits are going to be reduced by 28%.

That’s not how you solve the problem, idiot! That’s not how you solve any problem. ‘Oh, we don’t have enough money, so let’s take even less money in.’ That doesn’t work. For these people living off of Social Security, who get $1,100 a month, that’s just a tiny percent higher than making minimum wage, which is what most elderly people living off Social Security have to end up going to do. That’s why they’re greeters at big box stores, cashiers at grocery stores.

We have to take care of senior citizens, and in order to do that, we have to get rid of the Republican party all together. They got to go. The sad irony here is that the majority of Republican voters are over the age of 55. These people living off of Social Security, over the age of 65, 67, they’re the ones who put these people into power, who in turn want to cut their Social Security. Even though these elderly voters know this, they still vote them back in.

Read more: Republican Introduces Legislation To Completely Gut Social Security - The Ring of Fire Network

3/13/16

US Presidential Elections: Social Security: The GOP vs. the American People

n case anyone had any doubts, the most recent Republican presidential debate made crystal clear how out of touch the Republican establishment is with the American people.

Social Security is extremely popular with the overwhelming majority of Americans - whatever their Party affiliation, age, race, ethnicity, gender, or economic status. Social Security represents the best of American values. It is responsibly funded, does not add a penny to the deficit, and only pays benefits if it has sufficient income to cover not only the cost of all benefits, but also the cost to administer those benefits.

The American people recognize that expanding Social Security is a solution to, among other challenges, a looming retirement crisis. Traditional pensions are disappearing, the 401(k) retirement savings experiment is a failure, and middle class wealth in the form of home equity vanished overnight in the Great Recession.

Social Security is the most efficient, universal, secure and fair source of retirement income. It provides basic economic security when wages are lost as the result of death, disability, or old age. Its one shortcoming is that its benefits are too low. That is why there is a growing movement to expand those benefits.

The Republican establishment will have no part of this profoundly wise policy. They want to cut benefits. The moderators at Thursday's debate elicited this response from three of the four candidates in questions premised on what a Washington Post Plum Line contributor afterward characterized as a Zombie lie - that Social Security is going to "run out of money." (Revealingly, as part of the same discussion on Social Security, one of the two moderators, Dana Bash, cited information she received from a Washington group backed by a billionaire, Peter G. Peterson, who has spent decades on a crusade to cut Social Security.)

Against wise policy and even smart politics, three of the four candidates -- Senator Marco Rubio, Senator Ted Cruz, and supposed-moderate, Governor John Kasich -- expressed their strong desire for huge Social Security benefit cuts.

US Presidential Elections: Social Security: The GOP vs. the American People

6/9/15

The Netherlands: Largest Dutch Fed. of Labor Unions FNV tells Goverment : "stop changes to social security"

FNV chairman Ton Heerts said in a recent interview in the Dutch Financieele Dagblad  that the country’s biggest trade union federation, the FNV, is calling for a moratorium on further reforms in the social security sector.

In particular,mentioned the development of a new system to cover invalidity benefits and sick pay for freelancers which he said should not go ahead.. "Such a system is unaffordable, undesirable and impossible to achieve’, said Mr. Heerts.

Employers’ organization AWVN and a number of political parties have called for change to cope with the growing number of self-employed people in the Dutch workforce.

AWVN says many of them don’t take out insurance to cover themselves in case of sickness or long-term ill health.

Heerts says "the move to create a system for both employees and the self-employed’ might sound more caring,  however, in reality this is a "pipe dream"  developed by ‘right-wingers and employers who don’t want to pay any premiums and want to put all the risks on workers’ shoulders,’ he told the paper.

"Instead, employers and government should focus on ensuring companies don’t ditch their permanent staff and replace them by people on flexible or freelance contracts", said Heerts.

EU-Digest
FNV chairman Ton Heerts said in an interview in Tuesday’s Financieele Dagblad.

Read more at DutchNews.nl: FNV union wants a halt to social security changes http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2015/06/fnv-union-wants-a-halt-to-social-security-changes/
on Heerts said in an interview in Tuesday’s Financieele Dagblad

Read more at DutchNews.nl: FNV union wants a halt to social security changes http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2015/06/fnv-union-wants-a-halt-to-social-security-changes/

1/26/14

USA: Corporate Greed: 13 Mindblowing Facts About America’s Tax-Dodging Corporations

A judicious writer avoids adjectives like “mindblowing,” especially when covering political or economic issues.
But no other word seems to describe the stunning reality of corporate taxation in modern America, which cries out for the italics-heavy, exclamation-point-driven format made famous by Ripley’s Believe It or Not.

Stylistic overkill? Read these thirteen facts and you may change your mind.
1. We’re told we can’t “afford” full Social Security benefits, even though closing corporate tax-haven loopholes would pay for Obama’s “chained CPI” benefit cut more than ten times over!

Abusive offshore tax havens cost the US $150 billion in lost tax revenue every year (via FACT Coalition). That’s $1.5 trillion over the next ten years.

The “chained CPI” cut, proposed by President Obama and supported by Republicans, is projected to “save” a total of $122 billion to $130 billion over the same time period by denying benefits to seniors and disabled people.

It’s true. “Serious” politicians and pundits are demanding that ordinary people sacrifice earned benefits, while at the same time allowing corporations to avoid more than ten times as much in taxes.
2. Corporate tax rates are near their 60-year low, even though profits are at a 60-year high!
Need we say more?  (Source: Americans for Tax Fairness.)
3. Wells Fargo got $8 billion in tax breaks, even as executives at its subsidiary Wachovia avoided indictment for laundering money for the Mexican drug cartels!

 That’s right. Wells Fargo paid a negative tax rate of -1.4 percent between 2008 and 2010 while Wachovia, a Wells Fargo subsidiary, admitted to laundering more than $378 billion for Mexican drug gangs.

We’re talking about crazed killers like “El Loco” and gangs like “Los Zetas” – gangs who cut people’ heads off and toss them out onto disco dance floors or display them in the town square.
Wachovia bankers ignored repeated warnings from law enforcement officials, and continued to launder money for cartels that have murdered tens of thousands.

And yet no criminal indictments were handed down because, as a Senate investigator told Bloomberg News, “”There’s no capacity to regulate or punish them because they’re too big to be threatened with failure.”
4. Some other huge corporations paid less than nothing, too.
Pepco Holdings (-57.6% tax rate)
General Electric (-45.3%)
DuPont (-3.4%)
Verizon (-2.9%)
Boeing (-1.8%)
Honeywell (-0.7%)
5. The amount of money US corporations are holding offshore is an estimated one trillion dollars!
Rather than tax these profits the way other countries do, corporate politicians are promoting a tax “repatriation” break that would let corporations “bring this money home” while paying even less than their currently low rates.
They tried that in 2004 and it didn’t create any jobs. In fact, corporations took the tax break and then fired thousands of people. What “repatriation” did do is line a lot of wealthy investors’ pockets. So, naturally, they want to do it again.
6. One building in the Cayman Islands is the official location of 18,857 corporations!

According to the Government Accountability Office, a five-story building called “Ugland House” is home to nearly twenty thousand corporations. That’s impressive, especially for such a small edifice. (Perhaps it has supernatural half-floors and space-time defying “mind tunnels” like the office in Being John Malkovich.)

While impressive, Ugland House’s distinction pales next to that of 1209 North Orange Street in Wilmington, Delaware. According to one investigation, that address is home to 217,000 corporations.

That’s because Delaware has very generous tax rules – and, as a result, is home to more than half of all the corporate subsidiaries in the United States.That’s startling, since only 1/342th of the nation’s population lives in that state (917,092 residents, out of a national total of 313,914,040, according to the latest( census results).
7. Conservatives complain about the “official” corporate tax rate in this country, but corporations actually pay roughly one-third of the official rate in actual taxes.
The official, or “statutory,” corporate tax rate is 35 percent. But the actual rate paid by American corporations is only 12 percent, less than that paid by many middle-class Americans.  (Source: The FACT Coalition.) 

In fact, US Corporations pay less tax as a percentage of the GDP than corporations in Canada. Or Japan …
… or South Korea. Or Norway. Or Luxembourg, New Zealand, Israel, the Czech Republic, Sweden, Belgium, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, Denmark, Finland, and Italy.  (Source: OECD StatsExtract interactive database.) 
8. Corporations used to pay 30 percent of Federal taxes, and now they pay less than 7 percent!
That’s because the corporate tax rate has plunged since Dwight D. Eisenhower was President and is now the lowest it’s been in modern history.
(Source: FACT Coalition.)
9. Big corporations paid $216 million to Congress and got $223 billion in tax breaks!
As Citizens for Tax Justice and USPIRG reported, 280 large and profitable corporations contributed $216 million to Congressional campaigns over four election cycles and got nearly a quarter of a trillion dollars in tax breaks.
That’s a terrific investment for them – a return of more than a thousand to one – but it’s a bad deal for the American people.
10. We don’t even know who owns some corporations, even though that makes it easier to evade taxes, dodge creditors, avoid paying alimony or child support, and even fund terrorism!

Here are some examples of investments that might represent a terror threat. Corporate interests are blocking disclosure rules that would help protect our national security.
11. Bank of America committed foreclosure fraud, was bailed out by the government, and then paid no taxes on $4.4 billion in profit!

That’s right. In 2010, while BofA was negotiating a sweet settlement deal for its foreclosure fraud, it paid nothing in taxes. (Source: FACT Coalition.) Zero, on $17.2 billion in offshore earnings. (Source: Americans for Tax Fairness.)

Its $4.1 billion tax break came on the heels of the bank’s taxpayer-funded bailout, immunity from prosecution for its criminal employees, and a cushy government settlement for its foreclosure fraud.

Now David Dayen reports that the bank has apparently continued to defraud customers in violation of its government settlement. Whistleblowers have stated in affidavits that they were “told to lie” to customers, continued to deceive homeowners before foreclosing on them, and flipped customers to new servicing companies to invalidate previous homeowner agreements.
12. What they call “tax reform” would actually prevent our elected representatives from giving businesses financial incentives to improve our lives!

The word “reform” is an honorable one that’s been put to some dishonorable uses lately. “Entitlement reform,” for example, is merely a euphemism for gutting Social Security and Medicare.

Similarly, corporate-backed politicians are pushing a formula for permanent corporate tax breaks and calling it “tax reform.” They insist their “reform” be “revenue neutral” and say it will “broaden the base while lowering the rate.”

Here’s an English translation: The current, unsustainably low rates for corporations would be made permanent, while eliminating many tax deductions in the name of “simplification.”
Here’s what that really means: The domestic tax credit for creating jobs? Gone. Tax breaks for protecting the environment with clean energy, rather than harming other people’s health and leaving a mess for the rest of us to clean up? Gone.

All in all we’d lose dozens of important policies that make our lives better, while permanently fixing corporate taxes at today’s cushy giveaway rates.
“Reform”? Ripoff is more like it.
13. Despite their greed, mismanagement, and freeloading, tax-dodging corporations are using shell organizations like “Fix the Debt” and “the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget” to tell ordinary Americans they have to sacrifice even more to preserve corporate wealth!

These organizations are using the heads of failed banks – people like Chase’s Jamie Dimon and Lloyd Blankfein of Goldman Sachs – to dispense “advice on the economy.” That’s like getting navigation tips from the captain of the Exxon Valdez.
(Tax breaks for Exxon Mobil: $4.1 billion between 2008 and 2010. The company paid no taxes at all in 2009.)

These executives and their paid spokespeople tell the rest of us we need to “sacrifice” and “tighten our belts” so that their party can go on forever. And too often they’re treated as credible sources, rather than as corrupting influences on our public life.

It’s all true – and there are many more astonishing facts to be found in the world of corporate taxation. To fix the economy more people will need to learn about them – and demand that they be changed.

Read more: 13 Mindblowing Facts About America’s Tax-Dodging Corporations