In a global world, the question of solidarity is acquiring new
dimensions. Transnational solidarity seems an adequate response to the
power of multinational corporations and global finance. A number of
analysts have depicted how activists are now working across state
boundaries and forming transnational networks, campaigns and
organisations.
The problem is that more often than not, the new forms of solidarity have been limited to resisting privatisation, deregulation flexibility, and welfare cutbacks. At the same time the emerging field of transnational labour regulation has been mostly confined to the private, voluntary sphere. A wider and deeper conception of solidarity seems to be missing.
Read more: Democratic Global Keynesianism: A Long-overdue Vision Of Progressive Politics - Social Europe Journal
The problem is that more often than not, the new forms of solidarity have been limited to resisting privatisation, deregulation flexibility, and welfare cutbacks. At the same time the emerging field of transnational labour regulation has been mostly confined to the private, voluntary sphere. A wider and deeper conception of solidarity seems to be missing.
It is time to do some systematic
rethinking. From a political economy point of view, the relevant whole
is not the nation but the world economy. The mutual dependency of the
parts and whole works out, for instance, through effective demand and
the multiplier effect. For (post-)Keynesian economic theories, there is
no automatic mechanism synchronising diverse temporal processes.
Aggregate supply (the total productive capacity of the world economy)
does not usually equal aggregate effective demand (total spending
capacity in the world economy).
Without mechanisms to ensure a
sufficiently high level of effective demand for the goods and services
produced, these developments will result in excess capacity and
unemployment. Demand is always monetised, so what matters is whether the
interested consumers and investors can afford to buy the goods and
services. As the propensity to consume decreases with rising income,
demand depends also on income distribution. Due to degrees of monopoly –
always part and parcel of developments in capitalist market economies –
and financial and other more or less fixed temporal commitments, prices
do not easily decrease so as to match insufficient demand. And if
prices do fall, a self-reinforcing deflationary spiral becomes rather
likely.
Read more: Democratic Global Keynesianism: A Long-overdue Vision Of Progressive Politics - Social Europe Journal
No comments:
Post a Comment