 |
| "The good old days" are over |
At last, Saudi Arabia’s dismal human rights record is getting
media scrutiny, thanks in part to news that Saudi authorities plan to
lash 74-year-old Karl Andree, a British cancer survivor, 350 times
for possessing homemade alcohol. Flogging in the kingdom entails a
series of strikes with a wooden cane, with blows distributed across the
back and legs, normally not breaking the skin but leaving bruises.
This ruling comes after a year of bizarre and cruel punishments
meted out by the Saudi judiciary, including the public flogging of
liberal blogger Raif Badawi in January and a death sentence for Ali
al-Nimr, a Saudi man accused of protest-related activities allegedly
committed before he was 18 years old.
These incidents came to light even though Saudi Arabia
bans independent human rights monitors. Saudi Arabia rarely grants
United Nations experts or human rights organizations access, and because
it has no law allowing non-governmental associations, domestic
human rights groups are de facto forbidden.
More than a dozen Saudi
human rights advocates are languishing in prison today for “crimes”
related to their “illegal” human rights work; most are convicted for
“setting up an unlicensed organization.” These include activists such as
Waleed Abu al-Khair, currently serving an outlandish 15-year sentence
solely for his work exposing the government’s human rights abuses.
While Saudi Arabia receives some public scorn for discrimination against women, there is less public knowledge about its
systematic intolerance
of religious minorities. The country bans the public practice of any
religion other than Islam: there are no Christian churches or Hindu
temples to address the religious needs of millions of foreign workers.
Saudi Arabia doesn’t just abuse human rights at home. Since March,
a Saudi-led coalition has carried out a bombing campaign against
rebel forces in Yemen that has included indiscriminate attacks
killing civilians (some of which may be war crimes), and used banned
cluster munitions in civilian-populated areas. It has imposed a naval
and air blockade on Yemen’s 23 million people that has contributed to
alarming malnutrition levels, according to the United Nations
humanitarian office.
And Saudi Arabia’s membership in the UN Human Rights Council has
not led to improvements in its rights record. Instead, it has used
its position to
prevent
an international inquiry into laws-of-war violations committed in
Yemen. Somehow, bizarrely, Saudi Arabia serves as a partner in the U.S.
government’s campaign to “combat violent extremism”—despite its longtime
failure to address these issues at home in accordance with basic human
rights and the rule of law.
Allies such as the United States and the United Kingdom rarely criticize Saudi abuses; one U.S. official even recently “
welcomed” Saudi
Arabia’s participation at the Human Rights Council. British Prime
Minister David Cameron responded to the possible flogging of Mr. Andree
by meekly asking Saudi officials not to carry out the punishment.
However, the unprecedented attention on Saudi Arabia’s abuses in
2015 may be altering these dynamics, creating incentives for U.S.
and European politicians to support human rights in Saudi Arabia. The
U.K. government’s decision to scrap a £5.9 million bid to provide
a “training-needs analysis” to the Saudi prison system is one
example, as it appears the opponents of the deal were motivated by human
rights concerns. In March, Saudi Arabia blocked the Swedish foreign
minister from addressing the Arab League and temporarily halted visas
for Swedish businessmen after she criticized Mr. Badawi’s flogging as
“medieval.”
Saudi Arabia will employ all of its significant economic
and diplomatic clout to intimidate and silence anyone who dares
to challenge it on human rights grounds. According to The Intercept,
the news site co-founded by Glenn Greenwald, Riyadh has recently
hired several PR firms and lobbyists in Washington, including The Podesta Group, Edelman and DLA Piper to try to burnish its image.
But no PR campaign can whitewash the lashing of an elderly man,
the public beheading of an alleged child offender, or the
senseless bombing of Yemeni civilians. People are starting to take
notice—and perhaps if the U.S. government raised its voice for human
rights the Saudi government would rein in its abuses.
"According to British author John R. Bradley, public beheadings are the
“only form of public entertainment” in Saudi Arabia, aside from football
matches. Saudi Arabia has reportedly taken its number of executions for the
year to 100, far exceeding last year’s tally and putting it on course
for a new record.
According to a statement from the Saudi Press
Agency, two more convicted "criminals" were killed by the government on
Monday – including a foreign national guilty only of a non-violent drug
smuggling offense.
Read more: With the Saudis, the West Should Take No Prisoners | Human Rights Watch