Thousands are demanding justice after France’s minister for family,
children and women’s rights hurled a racist epithet against
African-Americans in an effort to denigrate Muslim women who wear
hijabs.
Laurence Rossignol made the comments on Thursday in an interview with RMC radio and BFM TV, during which she slammed retailers who design products for Muslim women, such as hijabs, arguing that these companies are “promoting the confinement of women’s bodies.”
When the journalist pressed Rossignol, arguing that some women choose to wear such items, the minister retorted: “Of course there are women who choose it. There were American negroes who were in favor of slavery.”
The French word that Rossignol chose to use, "nègres," is a particularly offensive and outdated term with colonial undertones. It is equivalent to the English word “negro,” and some argue it is as bad as the slur “n*gger.” The French word contrasts with other terms that are considered less offensive, such as “les noirs” and “les blacks.”
Rossignol’s use of this word has historic significance in a country that saw the birth of the mid-20th century “Négritude” movement, in which French writers and artists of African descent such as Aimé Césaire culturally reappropriated the term as an expression of identity and resistance.
Rossignol later admitted in an interview with AFP that she had used offensive language, stating: “I didn’t take into account the most widespread perception [of the word]—that one doesn’t say negro even if it is allowed in respect to slavery.”
But in in the same breath, Rossingol dug in her heels, declaring, “Outside of this error of language, I am not retracting a single word I said."
Rossignol’s comments instantly provoked uproar, with over 8,000 people signing an online petition demanding that the minister be “punished” for her racism. The statement declares that that the minister’s words constitute “an insult to the memory of millions of individuals, families and countries destroyed by slavery and its consequences.”
“It is terrible to see that persistent anti-black racism is used to justify and legitimize a gendered Islamophobia,” the petition adds.
Interviewed from Paris by AlterNet, Yasser Louati, spokesperson for the Collective Against Islamophobia in France, said that “racism, especially Islamophobia, is completely normal” in his country. This bigotry extends from the far right as well as the supposed progressive wings of the government, he argued, noting that Rossignol hails from the Socialist party.
“We have to keep in mind that France is the laboratory of Islamophobia, just like it was the laboratory of anti-Semitism in the 1930s,” Louati continued. “When you have a country being turned into a police state to justify mass surveillance and adopt the excesses of the U.S. Patriot Act, the dehumanization of Muslims makes it possible to play around with human rights and democracy.”
Note EU-Digest: Whatever the French Minister Laurence Rossignol might have said that did not sound appropriate to some, we must also understand and accept the fact, like it or not, that in Europe we believe in Democracy, which includes Freedom of Expression.
Laurence Rossignol should, therefore, certainly not be sacked.
The question which maybe should be asked instead is, when did Negro become a bad word, and if it’s such a bad word, why is it used to describe organizations like the American based UNCF (United Negro College Fund)?
Recently US Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) apologized for his published comments that President Barack Obama could become president because he was a“light skinned” African-American with “no Negro dialect.” This statement caused some to even seek Reid’s resignation.
In Portuguese, the word "Negro" is the correct term when referring to the race, while calling somebody "Black", the color, would be considered offensive most of the time.
Bottom line: Negro is not a "racist slur". "Nigger" is, but it isn't proscribed anywhere in the world - except in the US by the New York City Council, which passed a resolution against it in March 2007. All the resolution did was revive what writer, journalist and commentator Ta-Nehisi Coates called, writing in The New York Times, ('In Defense of a Loaded Word', 23 November 2013), "a fairly regular ritual debate over who gets to say 'nigger' and who does not".
Isn't it high time we put this issue to bed - after all, what's in a name, Black, Brown, Yellow, White, we are all part of one human race and when we bleed our blood is red. Aren't there far more "life and Death" issues in the world to worry about?
What we probably should get far more upset about is that the F word is now used in just about every situation, sentence and discussio, by the so-called millennials age group.
As to Sarah Lazare,who wrote the above article in Alternet, maybe she could be spending her time more productively if she wrote about some of the very serious racial inequalities and police brutality going on in the US.
Read more: French Minister Trashes Muslim Women With Anti-Black Slur: Will She Be Sacked? | Alternet
Laurence Rossignol made the comments on Thursday in an interview with RMC radio and BFM TV, during which she slammed retailers who design products for Muslim women, such as hijabs, arguing that these companies are “promoting the confinement of women’s bodies.”
When the journalist pressed Rossignol, arguing that some women choose to wear such items, the minister retorted: “Of course there are women who choose it. There were American negroes who were in favor of slavery.”
The French word that Rossignol chose to use, "nègres," is a particularly offensive and outdated term with colonial undertones. It is equivalent to the English word “negro,” and some argue it is as bad as the slur “n*gger.” The French word contrasts with other terms that are considered less offensive, such as “les noirs” and “les blacks.”
Rossignol’s use of this word has historic significance in a country that saw the birth of the mid-20th century “Négritude” movement, in which French writers and artists of African descent such as Aimé Césaire culturally reappropriated the term as an expression of identity and resistance.
Rossignol later admitted in an interview with AFP that she had used offensive language, stating: “I didn’t take into account the most widespread perception [of the word]—that one doesn’t say negro even if it is allowed in respect to slavery.”
But in in the same breath, Rossingol dug in her heels, declaring, “Outside of this error of language, I am not retracting a single word I said."
Rossignol’s comments instantly provoked uproar, with over 8,000 people signing an online petition demanding that the minister be “punished” for her racism. The statement declares that that the minister’s words constitute “an insult to the memory of millions of individuals, families and countries destroyed by slavery and its consequences.”
“It is terrible to see that persistent anti-black racism is used to justify and legitimize a gendered Islamophobia,” the petition adds.
Interviewed from Paris by AlterNet, Yasser Louati, spokesperson for the Collective Against Islamophobia in France, said that “racism, especially Islamophobia, is completely normal” in his country. This bigotry extends from the far right as well as the supposed progressive wings of the government, he argued, noting that Rossignol hails from the Socialist party.
“We have to keep in mind that France is the laboratory of Islamophobia, just like it was the laboratory of anti-Semitism in the 1930s,” Louati continued. “When you have a country being turned into a police state to justify mass surveillance and adopt the excesses of the U.S. Patriot Act, the dehumanization of Muslims makes it possible to play around with human rights and democracy.”
Note EU-Digest: Whatever the French Minister Laurence Rossignol might have said that did not sound appropriate to some, we must also understand and accept the fact, like it or not, that in Europe we believe in Democracy, which includes Freedom of Expression.
Laurence Rossignol should, therefore, certainly not be sacked.
The question which maybe should be asked instead is, when did Negro become a bad word, and if it’s such a bad word, why is it used to describe organizations like the American based UNCF (United Negro College Fund)?
Or why
does the NAACP in America still use "colored people" in the organization's name?
Should they change their name? Why is the C still allowed?
Recently US Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) apologized for his published comments that President Barack Obama could become president because he was a“light skinned” African-American with “no Negro dialect.” This statement caused some to even seek Reid’s resignation.
In Portuguese, the word "Negro" is the correct term when referring to the race, while calling somebody "Black", the color, would be considered offensive most of the time.
Bottom line: Negro is not a "racist slur". "Nigger" is, but it isn't proscribed anywhere in the world - except in the US by the New York City Council, which passed a resolution against it in March 2007. All the resolution did was revive what writer, journalist and commentator Ta-Nehisi Coates called, writing in The New York Times, ('In Defense of a Loaded Word', 23 November 2013), "a fairly regular ritual debate over who gets to say 'nigger' and who does not".
Isn't it high time we put this issue to bed - after all, what's in a name, Black, Brown, Yellow, White, we are all part of one human race and when we bleed our blood is red. Aren't there far more "life and Death" issues in the world to worry about?
What we probably should get far more upset about is that the F word is now used in just about every situation, sentence and discussio, by the so-called millennials age group.
As to Sarah Lazare,who wrote the above article in Alternet, maybe she could be spending her time more productively if she wrote about some of the very serious racial inequalities and police brutality going on in the US.
Read more: French Minister Trashes Muslim Women With Anti-Black Slur: Will She Be Sacked? | Alternet
No comments:
Post a Comment